Link to video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jOR4wuiPeEQ

TLDR: Hank Green independently discovers “Techno-Feudalism” and says he has not heard anyone else talking about this. Get Yanis Varoufakis on the phone with this liberal NOW!

  • D61 [any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    77
    ·
    1 month ago

    That’s oligarchy capitalism. And you could do that in a communist system.

    made-it-the-fuck-up If there’s oligarchs, then we can safely assume that the system they exist in isn’t a communist one.

      • TreadOnMe [none/use name]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        50
        ·
        1 month ago

        No no don’t you understand? He’s so smart because he has hyperfixations, but is able to channel them in a healthy way that isn’t just uncritically repeating the last ‘fact’ he read about and never questioning where that information and definition comes from.

        And since he is rewarded well for it, the system can’t be that bad, right? Right?

  • Andrzej3K [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    71
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    This dude’s whole schtick is taking a ‘closer look’ at something only to conclude that all economic relations are infinitely complex, and while fun to think about, ultimately inexplicable. SCIENCE!

    • TreadOnMe [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Well, I can’t make sense of where profit comes from without admitting it comes primarily from the exploitation of workers, so it must be horribly complex, because otherwise that would be too simple and someone else would have figured it out a long time ago.

    • PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 month ago

      Ever since Ricardo thesis made literally all honest economists to eventually arrive at some version of socialism (and Marx at scientific socialism), mainstream economy needed to take a step back to serve the bourgeoisie. At this point it’s basically Ouroboros-mammon cult whose main tasks are 1. Demonising marxism and 2. Producing economic theories that sound plausible to a laymen but are contradicting, backwards and ad odds with reality.

    • KurtVonnegut [comrade/them]@hexbear.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      50
      ·
      1 month ago

      I think you could, unironically, independently discover the entirety of Marx’s Das Kapital just by reading the Epstein files and getting angrier and angrier at all the rich people in the files.

  • RedWizard [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    61
    ·
    1 month ago

    This video has been sitting in my feed for days, begging me to watch it, like the one ring begging to be slipped onto a finger. I can only imagine how fucking libbed up this video is.

        • Andrzej3K [none/use name]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          35
          ·
          1 month ago

          Ime these big brain libs tend to define capitalism as ‘dynamic’ i.e. companies are being established, folding all the time, leading to innovation etc etc. So monopoly situations are ‘not-capitalism’ to these people. It’s bad because it’s unstable, and good because it drives innovation, and that duality is great because it allows liberals to feel very grown up and nuanced.

          This is also how they manage to convince themselves that China is “the most capitalist country in history” — they see a dynamic market and assume it must be capitalist

          • Sodium_nitride@lemmygrad.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            1 month ago

            China is “the most capitalist country in history”

            They still refuse to adopt or study Chinese economic policies BTW.

        • FloridaBoi [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          26
          ·
          1 month ago

          I doubt he even defines it. I’m reminded of a response that I think Antonio Negri (might be wrong) see below had to Thomas Piketty’s use of Capital and Capitalism without ever actually defining the terms. I can’t find it but it was really succinct

          edit: it was Frédéric Lordon

      • ItsPequod [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        42
        ·
        1 month ago

        I turned it off when I saw it was 45 fucking minutes of libbing it up lol I usually don’t mind the Green brothers but holy shit is this one especially smug and grating

    • Preston Maness ☭@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 month ago

      It’s terminally liberal. He keeps inching toward observations Lenin made a century ago and then whips right back to “but that’s not real capitalism!”

  • GoodGuyWithACat [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    1 month ago

    Communism is no longer when government do thing, it’s also when big company do thing.

    Doesn’t the other brother do Crash Course history? Why isn’t he making this slop?

  • ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    1 month ago

    Petit-borjuazee STEM-lord and whitest person in my recommended videos tab thinks capitalism isn’t that bad actually.

  • FuckyWucky [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    All this is just capitalism, the capitalists only care about turning money into more money. They don’t care how that money is coming from, asset price inflation, Government, credit whatever. One can call it a different variant, but its just capitalism at core.

    I mean, MIC has been a thing for decades, basically getting guaranteed transfers from the US Government. The banks were bailed out with $28T of Gov funds during GFC and Obamna did nothing to those responsible for it. The $28T didn’t go into a void, it becomes hoards for the capitalists, which aren’t taxed well or at all.

        • MeowZedong@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 month ago

          We live in the same town and I happen to know people who rent from him and who work for his merch company (they successfully unionized recently). He owns at least 3 properties in a town where those houses sell for $500,000+. I don’t remember if he inherited those through family or not and those are the only residential properties he owns that I am aware of.

          His union busting was with DFTBA (Don’t forget to be awesome). You won’t find any of this in the news or Wikipedia because it’s local stuff, low-profile, and he’s treated like he’s some saint by locals. I could drop the address of his house and the rentals he has on the same block.

          My main point is that of course these are his takes on economics, he benefits from the system.