• ploot@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    “I’ve talked to so many governors and congresspeople and senators and never once did they say Canada is the problem,” Ford told CNN. He emphasized that a bilateral deal between Canada and the U.S. would be a better solution than imposing tariffs on Canadian goods.

    I’m no fan of Doug Ford, but he’s right here. I guess Trump’s plan is to drive Canada into the ground economically through tariffs then invade or otherwise annex Canada when it’s too poor and desperate to resist. But why? It would be more profitable to both the USA and Canada simply not to do any of this. There are only two explanations I can think of:

    1. Belligerence is the only thing Trump understands, even when it works to his own disadvantage, because actual diplomacy is too complicated for him and soft power contains the word “soft”, and/or
    2. Trump isn’t working for the interests of the USA, but rather for those who want to see NATO and other Western alliances destroyed.
  • bitwaba@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    23 hours ago

    Watch out about offering to buy something. Sometimes they force you to go through with it.

    Ask Elon.

    • parrhesia@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      16 hours ago

      I mean would you rather join Canada or stay in the United States. Because if Texas gets to join Canada, I’m moving to Texas.

      • Ledivin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        How much control does Canada have over the provinces? Cause I’m not interested in slightly-Canadian Texas, they gotta go further than that.

    • parricc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      14 hours ago

      As a Texan, I’d fully support our state becoming part of a newly created Southwest Territories that is governed by Canada.

  • Boddhisatva@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    255
    ·
    2 days ago

    Following Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s resignation announcement on Monday, Trump claimed credit for the decision, saying that people in Canada “love” the idea of becoming a U.S. state. This prompted Ford to make his own comments about acquiring U.S. territories.

    …snip…

    Canadian MP Charlie Angus rejected the idea outright, pointing to differences in the nations’ laws. Angus stated on X that Canada has rules preventing “sexual abusers” from becoming leaders, a clear reference to allegations against Trump.

    I would love to have seen Trump’s face when he heard that rejection.

      • Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        22 hours ago

        No. He was found liable for sexual abuse in a civil trial. Convictions are criminal and the standard of evidence is higher.

        Basically the courts have decided that it’s slightly more likely than not that he sexually abused Carroll, which is all that’s needed to win a civil case. Criminal cases are on a “beyond a reasonable doubt” threshold which is much harder to meet.

        Frankly, he probably wouldn’t be criminally convicted because of the higher standard - the defense in a criminal trial doesn’t have to prove the accused didn’t do it, they don’t even have to prove it’s more likely than not they didn’t do it, they only need to prove there’s a reasonable doubt that they might not have done it. And I think there’s just enough wiggle room around it he could possibly skate by.

        • lennivelkant@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 hours ago

          On one hand, that’s how a criminal standard of justice should work, to prevent wrongfully convicting the innocent.

          On the other hand, that would require the system to be functional and fair in the first place, rather than being slanted towards who can afford the better lawyers, but that’s a whole can of worms I don’t think I need to crack open here - we all agree on that anyway.

  • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    I live in Massachusetts and would totally support seceding and going to Canada.

    Can RI come along too? You won’t have to worry about their terrible driving, they’d never drive out of the region.

      • x00z@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Sadly it’s completely illegal to separate from the US and most likely will result in the US military invading.

        Except ofcourse if Trump sells it.

        • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          It was illegal for India to declare independence from Brittian, but they did it.

          Minnesota should do this nonviolently. Just secede and if the military invades, dont fight back. The world will watch as Trump uses violence against them, until eventually more States join either Mexico or Canada. Eventually the US will cease to exist, and the ICC will come lock up Trump.

          It would be a beautiful, nonviolent end to the US Empire

      • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        66
        ·
        2 days ago

        I don’t mean to be depressing but envying Canada for its spectacular rail service would be inadvisable.

          • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            21 hours ago

            I grew up in Boston with the T - Skytrain is rather pleasant to ride but has absolutely horrible coverage. It connects to only a single university and it’s VCC - there is no connection to neither SFU nor UBC and in terms of commuting it’s only really relevant to New West and a narrow slice of Burnaby… there’s also no skytrain link to North Vancouver (I’m not counting SeaBus - while it’s a treat to occasionally ride it it’s slow as ass).

            • AbsentBird@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              19 hours ago

              It has service every 3 minutes, fully autonomous, and the coverage has been expanding consistently. The T started in 1889, it’s got a hundred years head start on SkyTrain.

              • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                1 day ago

                I have also ridden both. Amtrak is better than Via Rail.

                Both are are still better than nothing, though.

              • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                20
                ·
                edit-2
                2 days ago

                I have! VIA is actually worse and it’s so fucking disappointing.

                I will grant that I’ve never actually lost my seat on VIA due to overbooking (fuck Amtrak) but VIA’s pricing is so fucking horrible that it’s pretty much made itself irrelevant outside really short journies like the St. Lawrence valley cities.

              • hobovision@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                10
                ·
                2 days ago

                I’ve ridden Amtrak but I’ve also seen videos about how Via Rail is basically unusable. Amtrak has improved significantly in the past decade as well, while Via seemingly regressed (again, Via info is based on other people’s experiences, not mine).

        • circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          2 days ago

          Compared to the US, Canada may as well be Japan in terms of rail.

          It’s ironic that the US was ultimately born and raised on expansion of rail, but because cars became so profitable and lucrative, US passenger rail is a constant afterthought, if it’s even an option at all.

            • circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              If you’ve ever ridden Amtrak, you probably know what the big problem is: most rail lines in the US give extreme priority to freight, and the freight operators basically own all the track. As a result, Amtrak is constantly late – sometimes very late, since it needs to wait for freight to do its thing.

              Couple that with Amtrak rates being sky high, plus the fact that it’s extremely slow even without the freight waiting, and it’s a much deeper story than how much track exists.

              • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 day ago

                Same thing at Via Rail. We stopped a looong time in the middle of nowhere one time so a freight could push through.

                They were more chill than Amtrak tho, and they let people get off, stretch their legs and smoke

              • Oascany@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                8
                ·
                2 days ago

                Riding on VIA is incredibly expensive, on occasion 3-4 times the price of a flight. Incredibly inconvenient, checked luggage and weighed carry-on and all that jazz, despite being a literal railway. Incredibly slow, it’s faster to drive to Toronto from Vancouver. VIA is absolutely awful and I will never ride it again until it’s fixed. On the other hand, AmTrak from Vancouver to Seattle is not awful. Both are miserable on a world stage but it’s like putting the bottom two against each other.

                • circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  That does make sense.

                  Related to my original comment, I’ve been on a Japanese Shinkansen many times. It is a shockingly different experience. Comfortable, clean, no fuss, and relatively inexpensive. From Tokyo to Kyoto in about 2 hours (roughly 450km distance).

                  Once you leave the high speed train, you’re greeted by a subway system also second to none. Get virtually anywhere you need to in the city without the need for a car. A 45 minute ride tends to be $3-4.

                  Even in cities with relatively limited subway systems (limited for Japan – still extensive in many comparisons), like Kyoto, the bussing system is actually fantastic. Equally clean, and you can even use the same touch card you use for rail.

                  European trains are pretty great too. Maybe not as nice as Japan, but e.g. the German ICE is pretty clean and also affordable. Sure, DB is famous for being late too, but not Amtrak levels of late.

                  I guess that was just a ramble. All to say: what wonderful things our “modern” countries could do if we didn’t idolize fighting amongst ourselves.

    • Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      2 days ago

      …aight, just give the rest of us some fair warning first. I live deep in Y’all Qaeda territory, and I don’t want to miss that boat!

    • 👍Maximum Derek👍@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      2 days ago

      I’m an Oregonian whose been craving a trip to Victoria, BC so I support the plan where I don’t need a passport to do so. And I assume this would come with a box set of Kim’s Convenience and/or Schitt’s Creek?

      But I think the GDP of those states is higher than the whole of Canada (and most of Europe). So how about we go it our own way but set up one of those fun free-trade, free movement unions with our francophonic friends.

      • Cheems@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        First off as ambassador to the Upper peninsula of Michigan. We do not want to be part of Wisconsin. The whole of Michigan would be good with being part of Canada. And we request Minnesota as a plus one.

      • bitchkat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Why the fuck would you want to do that to Canada. Wisconsin can suffer the consequences of that which they helped bring forward. They got all the Foxconn money rolling in.

  • Glytch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    58
    ·
    2 days ago

    Please sell Minnesota/Minneapolis to Canada. Please. I would much rather be Canadian.

        • bitchkat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 days ago

          Its weird. I had UHC for several years and had no problem with them covering anything. I kind of wonder if they treat locals differently because their employees would be affected?

          • samus12345@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            24 hours ago

            Which several years? The CEO who was offed recently drastically increased the rate of denials within the last few years.

          • Test_Tickles@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            2 days ago

            It is possible that some VP paid a fortune to have someone determine the maximum distance that an angry mob was willing to travel and now they make sure to only screw over people inside that boundary just enough to keep it sub angry mob levels.

  • AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    63
    ·
    2 days ago

    How about if we buy Alaska and throw in Minnesota and Minneapolis at the same time?

    Joke’s on them—Minneapolis is in Minnesota, so they’d only be getting two regions instead of three. Sell them quick before they catch on!