• Gosplan14_the_Third [none/use name]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          4 months ago

          It’s doomerism, I think. Just like Miyazaki.

          Especially 1990-2005 was the “end of history” after all - for as many Ls we take nowadays from the position of weakness, the neoliberals seemed unstoppable back then. And if, instead of mounting frustration and anti-systemic anger, you have less and less comrades every year, you’re bound to eventually either give up, become a cynic, or get weird with it.

          • GrouchyGrouse [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            That makes sense, now that you put it that way. They refuse to become the enemy (neoliberal) but their future seems foreclosed (socialism) so the only direction to turn is the past…

            • Gosplan14_the_Third [none/use name]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              3 months ago

              Conspiracy theories, the past when everything made sense, nationalism without socialism to reach the goals socialism couldn’t deliver on, etc.

              Though of course, the seeds of future political itineraries were already present and not fought against when they were leftists. Those who became libs having a strong stance on freedom and democracy and how socialism could expand it, the future fash being content with having a strong and Well-functioning state, etc. Genuine proletarian desire to overthrow capital is not the first priority of at least a large minority of the left.