

It is mostly about the sound they make when slapped.
It is mostly about the sound they make when slapped.
You’re telling me there’s food in my food?
Yeah it’s Varoufakis’ thing. I think it is just monopoly capitalism in reality but it’s very funny that parent didn’t even Google it.
Of course, friend. Sorry if I came across as belligerent or argumentative, I mean to just be riffing along as well.
I feel like a site that just took the list of worka from marxist.org, used their own translations/versions, and added some notably missing worka would do well so long as it had a catchy url.
What exactly is a scholar monk? Trots have a selective canon, generally one intended to promote the idea that Trotsky was the co-revolutionary with Lenin and that one should engage primarily with Trotsky’s speculative (and historically, a failure revolutionarily) works in exile. They talk about transitional programs so much they forget to engage critically with their failure to produce the revolution that requires transition.
I think there is a parallel in that Trotskyists are often correctly labeled as “academic Marxists”, which is really just an insult meaning, “a self-labeled Marxist that is wrong and does no organizing but uses a lot of words and references from Marxist theory”. Is that a monk scholar? They catalog and go on at length about hypotheticals but fail to do praxis, e.g. converting the nonbelievers and educating the believers?
Marxists.org is useful in that it makes works available for free and is an easy to remember domain. There are other projects doing similar things but they don’t have the luck of owning a domain called marxists.org.
lmao what a coward.
PS the standard you are using for free speech is literally the capitalist imperialist US supreme court. You know, the one that has consistently validated slavery, genocide, mass disposession, and of course, crackdowns on left speech.
Why is it that you, a “leftist”, constantly appeals to imperialist liberal thought?
lmao they declared they blocked hexbear, apparently because they are too afraid to confront their ignorance and chauvinism: https://hexbear.net/post/5385022
Your words and opinions are a regurgitation of ancient red scare propaganda. They are easy to recognize when you actually learn (or really, unlearn) how language and narratives have been crafted against the left. You have no knowledge of this so you believe your language, which could be lifted from the mouth of a genocidal US general in the 60s (or a racist anarchist in the 30s!), is actually your own unique idea and not something you have absorbed from your context - your upbringing, your education, your social circle, and the media you are exposed to.
Again, you know basically nothing here. You tacitly admit it with every obvioua fib. Just be honest and ask questions instead of trying to fight when you have tied both of your own hands behind your back.
You are a knee-jerk chauvinist that makes things up and parrots the false anti-left language of imperialists (capitalists), regardless of how you self-label.
Do some self-reflection. You know so little, you should be asking questions, not picking fights.
Not an expert but I’d put it somewhere around “using ‘tech’ (as in computers, software, etc.) to carry about fraudalism.”
So you have no idea at all and are just guessing based on the composite words. And yet you try to tell people China has this model?
What is the right word to use when someone is pretending to know things when they have never even tried to learn them?
If you’re wondering where I’d put feudalism, I’d be something like “limiting People’s economic (and sometimes social) mobility through leveraging ownership of resources the person needs to survive”.
And you would be incorrect. Many previous and current economic system can be described this way, including capitalism. This does not distinguish feudalism and you would misinfoem others if you continue to make shit up like this.
Have some basic humility.
Freedom of speech does not exist anywhere and is an idealist myth constructed for the purpose of western imperialist chauvinism. This is why it is easy for people here to clock your liberalism.
Your parroting of imperialist talking points and language.
Define technofeudalism
Everyone knows that Animal is a Maoist
Even if he disappoints it is something to work with. Just like how Sanders caused an uptick through mobilizing socdems and then disappointed them, helping them radicalize.
Haha get fucked. Anyone that romanticizes t imperialist Vietnam tours deserves many wake-up calls.
Best tires for the city, they say: slicks that puncture if you look at them wrong.
The city: where every street is littered with glass.
I’ve been lucky but I think it helps that my tires are a little knobbly.