Edit: Sheesh. Some of you folks need this.

Dictionary Definitions from Oxford Languages

up·lift·ing /ˌəpˈliftiNG/

adjective

adjective: uplifting

inspiring happiness, optimism, or hope. “an uplifting story of triumph over adversity”

  • melsaskca@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    7 days ago

    This isn’t a fact but I have a gut feeling that people will be taking their power back in the near future.

    • paperazzi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      7 days ago

      Every dip into fascism in human history has been accompanied by an eventual upswing and purging of said fascists so, yes, I believe you are right.

      • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        7 days ago

        IDK…some places have never really had Democracy, or their democracy is openly corrupt, or have been some other shitty leadership for generations. People can live under these systems…just the have/have not division can be really stark.

  • CannonFodder@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    Humans aren’t destroying the earth. We may be changing it so it’s no longer hospitable to us, but the earth will go on fine even if humans extinct themselves.

  • Hemingways_Shotgun@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    7 days ago

    My go to happy thought is this:

    Wild dogs, wolves, coyotes, etc… don’t have eyebrows. That is to say that they never evolved the muscles necessary to move their eyebrows in an expressive way.

    Moveable eyebrows were a trait that domesticated dogs specifically evolved in order to mimic their humans and invoke more empathy (and let’s face it…likely manipulate us for more treats)

    https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/domestication-made-dogs-facial-anatomy-more-fetching-to-humans/

  • Libb@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    128
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 days ago
    • public libraries are still there.
    • Book (physical) can still be purchased and fully owned, without any risk of them being remotely edited or deleted and without nay tracking of our reading habits.
    • Walking is still free, without any subscription required.
    • It is still legal to turn off one’s phone.
    • I love my spouse at least as much as I loved her when we first met almost 30 years ago. And, yep, she seems to kinda like me too ;)
    • Rikudou_Sage@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      9 days ago

      Ebooks can be purchased as well, with a little skill (or reading a tutorial) you can make it undeletable and uneditable as well.

      Source: My epub library growing day by day, synced between multiple devices by syncthing.

      • Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 days ago

        Why go through the trouble of purchasing them with DRM and supporting that garbage and doing all the work to make them your own?

        Piracy is infinitely superior.

          • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 days ago

            They already don’t get paid. Nearly every writer has to supplement their income with a paying job. Writers know this.

            Piracy doesn’t hurt the writers nearly as much as it hurts the publisher, and that’s the point. If publishers get hurt badly enough and can’t operate properly, then writers will find a different path, and go independent, and keep all the money for themselves. THEN I’d want to buy directly from the author.

      • Libb@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 days ago

        Ebooks can be purchased as well, with a little skill (or reading a tutorial) you can make it undeletable and uneditable as well.

        You’re quite right (at least it used to be easy, I have not checked for some time how hard it is now to get rid of Apple’s and/or Amazon’s DRM… the two main DRM-locked ebook sellers), but keep in mind not everybody feels ok to not respect the rules and/or breach the contract they signed. Also there is no need to that at all with printed books.

        • definitemaybe@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          Not parent poster, and you’re totally correct… But paper-format books don’t work at all for me, or many others with accessibility needs. I read almost exclusively with TTS while driving/doing chores/walking or to fall asleep. It’s… very hard to TTS a paper book.

          So, an old (<= 5th gen) Kindle works great. They’re incompatible with the newest Kindle DRM, so they still allow old methods to transfer books. For KU books, it also has built-in TTS, so you can leave the book “reading” for you after you’ve transferred the file to your “real” device. That way authors get paid for your page reads, but you can still read/store/transfer/preserve the book.

          But Amazon still tracks your reading data, and you’re still supporting Amazon’s/Kindle’s self publishing monopoly… But it’s literally the only place where books from my genre of choice are available, so not really any good options until their unethical monopoly is regulated away from them.

        • Rikudou_Sage@lemmings.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 days ago

          I was just pointing out that if that’s your major reason for buying physical over digital, it’s solved very easily.

          I for one really don’t like owning many physical books because of the space it takes and 95% of my book purchases are digital.

      • Libb@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 days ago

        You mean it is worrisome (sorry, English is not my native language)? If so, it’s the intend because I think there is already too many hints pointing out to a (slow?) vanishing of many of those ‘options’.

        • HubertManne@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 days ago

          yeah essentially its like. for now. implying they will be gone which is like part of the things I worry about for the future.

          • Libb@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 days ago

            It’s one of the reasons I decided a while ago to move back from digital to analog (I started using ebooks in the early 00s and have been mostly reading ebooks up 2 or 3 years ago, approx.) for as many things as I was able to, not just reading books.

            Physical ownership and ‘not-Internet’ & ‘not-high-tech’ dependent medium should be a lot more resilient to any excess of control, surveillance and censorship than anything digital. Plus, baring accidents, all of those analog things will outlive me and my spouse (we’re both well into our 50s) and, unlike with digital ‘objects’, it’s very easy for us to make sure those analog objects will end up in the hands of a new owner that will know how to best use them… without anyone having much to say about it.

  • Frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    74
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 days ago

    Fascism doesn’t actually last that long. At some point, policies have to have some kind of attachment to reality, and fascists are incapable of grappling with reality.

      • NABDad@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        9 days ago

        Franco was the first one I thought of. However, his fascism didn’t outlive him, and President Pedophile doesn’t have 36 years to go.

        • MotoAsh@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          But many other fascists have now been given power by TacoBoy. I don’t think any singular person’s demise is ever going to be as “uplifting” as many are dreaming…

      • Frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        9 days ago

        Historians debate just how fascist Franco really was. In fact, Orwell wasn’t even that sure when he wrote Homage to Catalonia, and he was quite clear that he went to Spain expressly to kill a fascist.

        • IronBird@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          i recall my spanish friend saying something like it wasnt really franco that was the problem, but all the aristocrats wanting to use him as their source of legitimacy

        • ScrooLewse@lemmy.myserv.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 days ago

          Putin has always been a dictator, but he hasn’t always been a fascist. He started his career as a moderate technocrat that happened to have incredible access to KGB resources. Very handy if you’re in the market to be forever president. As time went on he’s been mixing and remixing his stances and aims.

          As far as NK, I’m not sure they’ve ever been fascist. They’re just a vanilla authoritarian police state.

          A major component you can use to point out fascism specifically out of the rogues gallery of evil ideologies is the notion that a fascist government specifically derives its power from endlessly designating and promising to destroy out-groups. If it lasts long enough to run out of targets, it goes on to consume itself.

        • neukenindekeuken@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          8 days ago

          Those are well crafted, defensive dictatorships at this point that have had decades and decades to sow the seeds of complacency and authoritarian control of their population. In one of those examples, the people of NK worship Kim and his father and grandfather as literal gods. So Americans aren’t quite there yet.

          Not saying they’re super far off, but still a bit to travel before you get to centuries of repressed soviet/russian control and literal god-king dictators with an iron first around their populace.

    • Øπ3ŕ@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 days ago

      Well, we all wish they’d “grapple” with a few rounds at high velocity instead of fingerbanging their own shit and screaming incoherently. They’re infecting the other adult-sized toddlers, and it’s getting tedious to corral at this point.

  • frankPodmore@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    66
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 days ago

    We’re actually doing pretty well, globally, at shifting to renewables. We’re making more, more quickly and more cheaply than ever before.

    • Dharma Curious (he/him)@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      9 days ago

      I dream of finding the wallet stuffed with enough cash to dig me out of this mess, but in reality, if there’s any way at all to get it back to who dropped it, I will. Found a wallet a few months ago on a day trip, laying in the road. Ending up using the names on the credit cards to Facebook stalk a dude, found his company website, called him, and met him a half hour later to return it. Had like 800 dollars in cash it. I just… Can’t be an asshole, even when it would benefit me

      • NoSpotOfGround@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 days ago

        You’re good people, don’t regret it. Incidentally, I’d probably grab a handful of the cash and just hand it to whoever returned the wallet to me like that. It was lost anyway.

        • Dharma Curious (he/him)@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          8 days ago

          Dude was very appreciative, he was panicked because he had pictures and sentimental things in it. Did not offer a reward and we didn’t ask… I did hope. But I didn’t ask. Lol

          • definitemaybe@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            7 days ago

            I’ve been on the flip side of this. You’re so panicked about getting your wallet back, and wondering if it was carelessness or thieves, that you don’t even think of giving a reward if you get it back.

            I think the worry about thieves also primes us to not want to give money, too, but that’s just speculation.

            I’ve also been the one delivering a lost wallet full of cash and got no reward, lol.

      • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        8 days ago

        Back in the 80s, I was at the Consumer Electronics Show in Vegas, and a guy left his wallet in our booth, stuffed with money.

        I took it back to my room, and only removed his Driver’s License, so I could see where he lived. I found out the area code for his city, called Information, and asked for his phone number. His name wasn’t there, but there was one woman’s listing with the same last name, so I called it, and reached his mother.

        She was immediately worried, but I quickly explained that her son was fine, “But he left his wallet in my booth, and he’s probably in a full on panic by now. Please call him, and let him know that he can pick it up at our booth tomorrow.”

        We didn’t have cell phones back then, so she would have had to contact his company, find out what hotel he was staying in, and then get the message to him, but she must have done all that, because he came blasting into our booth the next morning, still in a panic.

        I handed him his wallet, and he took out a $50 bill and tried to give it to me. I refused it, happy to do a good deed, but he threw it at me and ran out of the booth!

        I was in Vegas, what do you think I did with it? It was gone 5 minutes after leaving my booth.

    • brbposting@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 days ago

      Reminded of when someone opened their car window and yelled to me on the sidewalk that I had dropped some cash on the ground :)

      Last time I ran out to a parking lot to find someone who dropped some cash in a store, they split some of it with me!

  • kubok@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    9 days ago

    Here’s one I like: despite the efforts of Big Oil and their orange-painted lackey, the amount of renewable energy generated in the first half of 2025 has surpassed energy generated by fossil means.

    Source.

  • acchariya@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    8 days ago

    Renewable energy and battery storage are seeing an absolute collapse in prices such that it is inevitable in the near to mid term future that we will move away from fossil fuel extraction leaving much of it in the ground. This will happen no matter who is in charge politically or who tries to subsidize fossil fuels because money is king and a lot of free energy hits the earth every day.

    This, combined with falling birthrates, means we will hit peak carbon emissions and begin to drop back to a new normal, a new economy built around labor rather than capital because of the shift in balance between resources and workers similar to what happened during the black death. It is my opinion that this will begin to happen in my lifetime and will fully come to pass in our children’s lifetime.

    • crystalmerchant@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      8 days ago

      Having worked in energy for 10 years (particularly battery storage and solar) you are correct about the prices falling, and in my opinion you are also correct about this dooming fossils.

      However, I do not agree with your second point around a new economy arising built around labor rather than capital. The mechanics of value creation can change (eg renewables vs fossils) but what the ruling class will not allow to change without intense prolonged struggle is their own position as the rulers.

      • acchariya@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 days ago

        You might be right, but my idea on it is that productivity increases have leveled off and population will begin falling in our lifetime. The ruling class loses power historically when the supply of labor is impacted.

        • MotoAsh@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          Why do you think they’re all desperately pretending that LLMs are gen AI? They want to secure their revenue without having to care what the plebs do.

          and we both know governments both today and throughout history protect the rich and money over people…

          You’re both right. You are in that their influence will wane, but they’re right in that it won’t be fast or pretty.

  • neidu3@sh.itjust.worksM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    9 days ago

    Trump is pretty old, and I cannot think of an example where a movement based around a cult of personality has successfully survived long after their leader has gone. Nor are there any viable successors that are likely to dodge any infighting. JD Vance as a successor? Yeah, ain’t happening.

    To summarize, the pendulum will eventually swing the other way. And the worse the MAGA crowd pulls it in their direction now, the harder it will swing.

    • TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      9 days ago

      yeah. frankly while most left/liberal dont’ see it, Trump is also a product of the pendulum swinging. we have been on a good spat of liberalization for 30+ years and there was going to be a backlash. and as someone who grew up working class white, i totally get the unfairness and bitterness of so many of those people who the economic/education system has totally abandoned, and the horrible feelings and condescending that comes from the liberal elite/educated set who look down on everyone who isn’t highly educated and living in a coastal city. i got lucky and got to be one of those people, but many of my peers did not.

      frankly i find it truly revolting how much of liberal america is so disgusting smug and condescending towards anyone who isn’t exactly like them, and that massively accelerated in the 2010s. used to be in the 2000s people would respect/admire me for working my way from a poor working class family to elite school on scholarship and putting myself through grad school and building al ife for myself… somewhere around 2015 that all became to change though and i repeatedly starting meeting folks who told me that i should have ‘stayed in my place’ and my ‘education is wasted on losers like you’. etc. and that attitude has only gotten worse and worse in the 2020s. i’d say there is a massive massive increase in class snobbery and elitism that didn’t exist 10-20 years ago.

      i’ve also noticed progressives have moved away from economic issues largely and are entirely focused on culture war bullshit, esp use trans people and trans rights as the most important thing ever, which has alienated many many people due to the rage and hatred being spouted over it. to me this is a horrible horrible move, and plays right into the right wing’s advantages. because they are offer a much clearer narrative about these things than the left/liberals are. and clear narratives win elections and voters.

      what baffles me is how the democrats can’t understand or replicate Obama’s success and messaging and act like he was some act of God. He wasn’t. He just appealed to people’s sentiments and listened to them… just like Trump did in this last election… meanwhile the democrats totally ignore the people and lecture us that they know better than we do what is going on in the country and we should be happy with how things are.

      I hope someone on the left/dems capitalized on the severe economic need in this country and steers away from the culture war bullshit. A candidate that wants to actually fix the problems in this country that affect everyone, but it seems nobody is coming forth to do so. And at best we are just getting some candidates who are just going to go with the ‘trump bad, me not trump’ routine again, which we know doesn’t work.

      what a lot of people miss in Trumps success is that he had a clear vision people could get behind, even if it was all bullshit and lies.

      • MotoAsh@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 days ago

        He didn’t have a clear vision. He had contradictory promises all over the place.

        You must be a troll if you’re dumb enough to think all that tripe.

      • WoodScientist@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        esp use trans people and trans rights as the most important thing ever, which has alienated many many people due to the rage and hatred being spouted

        You have completely and hopelessly fallen for Republican propaganda. You’ve swallowed their entire framing of trans issues without any thought. You’re repeating the Republican Party line verbatim.

        Democrats have spent the last decade trying to stay the hell away from the trans rights discussion at every opportunity. They’re not over bigots like Republicans, but they try to talk about literally anything else. Republicans however have continued to scream from the rooftops about trans people, as they try to incite the populous to acts of literal genocide.

        Where are all these Democratic leaders that spend all their time talking about trans people? Can you name a single one? You’ve been brainwashed by conservative media.

        • TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          Except I’ve been personally assaulted, threaten, and attached by trans people and their rabid allies for suggested trans people are just people and they don’t need special treatment. In person. In real life. i’ve been screamed at my face and threated with violence for not ‘using the right pronoun’, even after i asked them what pronoun they wanted and use it…

          I live in a progressive area. Trans people here have it good. But a lot of them refuse to accept that… they want to abolish sex/gender entirely and become physically violent towards anyone who says ‘maybe you should chill and just enjoy your life’ or dates to accidentally ‘misgender’ them. They are the bullies and bigots here.

          I’m glad you’ve never been personally attacked and harassed. I’ve had trans folks literally verbally assault me for waiting for coffee because I ‘look too straight’ whatever the fuck that means. multiple times over the past three years especially. Literally had some trans guy scream in my face on the subway yesterday while I was sitting in the corner minding my business and him going on and on about ‘don’t you like my beautiful care I’m a lady now why dont’ you want me i know you want me because you’re a removed i can tell because you have nice boots you take it in the ass.’ And I’m sitting there just ignoring them because I don’t want to engage some mentally ill psycho.

          Just because you’re trans or leftist, doesn’t give you the right to assault and harass other people. Most of the democratic party pols are pro-trans agenda. And the ones who dare speak out against it and say stuff like 'maybe men shouldn’t be in women’s sports, or ‘maybe we should have 3 kinds of bathrooms’ get attacked mercilessly and called bigots and hateful by the nutbags. Every moderate democrat who speaks out on the issue gets attacked, despite having popular support because they expressing a more common sense approach instead of a ‘trans people should have no rules or restrictions on them that the rest of us cis people deal with’.

          I don’t care about anyone being trans. But I care about insane people using their trans identity to abuse and harass other people, to file lawsuits and etc all because they feel they need to be treated differently than everyone else. Like you want gender affirming care? cool, but don’t give 12 year olds puberty blockers. 12 year olds have no idea who or what they are. let them figure it out when they are young adults like the rest of us. Just like we shouldn’t allow 12 year olds to get plastic surgery or tattoos or any of that type of body modfication

          but any complexity or nuance on this issue gets the pro-trans extremists calling anyone a bigot. people should be allowed to be critical of these things. discussion and debate should be allowed to happen without the threat of violence and harassment from the pro-trans people or the anti-trans people.

          funny how i’ve never seen a pro-trans person irl on online every have a good discussion of these issues… they just resort to insults and harassment and refuse to acknowledge anyone else’s concerns or questions. it’s almost as if they are just as ignorant and hateful on these things as someone who is anti-trans. and it’s not so much about trans people… as it is about their little culture war bullshit.

          ironically when i see trans people discuss some of these things… who dont’ have an agenda… they are a lot more moderate on ‘trans issues’. probably because they are just a person and not some ideologue using trans people as a prop to further their political agenda.

    • ComradeMiao@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      8 days ago

      I cannot think of an example where a movement based around a cult of personality has successfully survived long after their leader has gone.

      Most religious cults especially Christianity lol, what a statement