• xor@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    5 hours ago

    how about: tiered copy rights?
    after 5 years, you lose some copyright but not all?

    it’s a tricky one but impoverished people should still be able to access culture…

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      What does that even mean though? Like, you would retain the ability to sell and modify it but not a monopoly on free distribution?

      I think 10-15 years, i.e. the original copyright act in the US (14 years) is totally fair, and allow a one-time renewal if you can prove it’s still available for purchase and losing copyright would impact your livelihood or something.

      • xor@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        i left it open ended like that because there’s a lot of options….
        i’d probably start with selling, like after 5 years people are welcome to copy it and distribute it but not sell it…
        but i mean, a lot of variations are possible….

      • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Probably allowing everything but producing reproductions.

        Basically they could use the ideas from the book and whatnot to do whatever. But they couldn’t just print duplicates with a different cover and sell them for cheaper.

        • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 hours ago

          I suppose it would encourage George Martin to get a move on. Otherwise you could set stories in his universe before he finished writing the third book. I still think 5 years is too short though.