We’ve seen an uptick in people posting dunks in here that belong in dunk_tank, as well as low-hanging fruit that gets removed from or isn’t allowed in dunk_tank anymore. For context, rule 8 of dunk_tank:

Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this.

There’s a reason that dunks are cordoned off to their own comm, some users rightfully don’t want to see reactionary nonsense all the time, even if we’re making fun of the person who said it. /c/cth is a general-purpose comm but it’s NOT for posting some random nobody asshole twitter user’s bad takes, the absolute best course of action to take when you see that stuff out in the wild is to either directly shit on them yourself, or ignore them and don’t give them more attention.

From this point on I’m going to be more stringent about moderating this. I get it, it’s fun to dunk on the libs and the blue checks and the frothingfash and that’s why we have a whole dedicated comm for that. Any post that’s obviously meant to be “hey look at this piece of shit, let’s laugh at how bad their opinions are, upbears to the left and emojis in chat” belongs in the_dunk_tank. And any super low-hanging fruit doesn’t belong on this site, period (see TDT rule 8 above). We have better things to do with our time than give unearned attention, time and energy to low-follower-count nobodies yelling into the void.

Thanks for your discretion comrades, stay sicko sicko-jammin

edit: as others have pointed out, /c/shitreactionariessay@lemmygrad.ml is a good place for any and all dunking content not allowed here. Post that ragebait to our comrades at the 'grad, they’ll make good use of it. Also, per rule 9 of TFT dunking on fediverse users is still explicitly allowed so it’s still open season on those in our own backyard.

  • FunkyStuff [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    7 months ago

    Yeah, but it should cool off after a while. I’m sure that now both comms are going after the low hanging fruit posts the posts will just wean off.

      • FunkyStuff [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        7 months ago

        shrug-outta-hecks They belong better in some of the Lemmygrad lib showcase comms. I’ve seen too many posts on here and /r/trueanon that are just random nobodies saying deranged things 4 years ago. I don’t mind it too much and it’s ultimately not dissimilar from the approved posts, but it’s extremely reddit energy to be dunking on low hanging fruit from trolls.

            • booty [he/him]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              11
              ·
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              Why do we have to “defeat” bad posts at all? Hexbear is a site where a significant portion of the posts are bad on purpose. We have an entire comm dedicated to posting the worst posts we can come up with. Title: I farded, body: hehe is a completely valid Hexbear post. In fact, it’s probably been posted multiple times already.

              We should be “defeating” posts that are racist, ableist, transphobic, liberal, etc. We shouldn’t be “defeating” posts that are bad, that’s what this site is for

                • GarbageShoot [he/him]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  15
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  Your application of your political ideology to how you think the site should be run is incoherent enough that being facetious in that fashion doesn’t work.

                • booty [he/him]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  14
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  Maybe if you could articulate an actual reason that you’ve chosen one particular genre of hexbear post to bully people with your mod powers over, I would be more open to laughing at your jokes. As it stands, your communications here just sound lifeless and corporate and make it difficult to entertain any humor involved.

                  • OrionsMask [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    11
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    7 months ago

                    “The mods are bullying people.” Hexbear gets so dramatic when faced with the prospect of doing something else with its time rather than scraping through and being dragged down by the absolute dregs of humanity.

                • booty [he/him]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  9
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  then block the comm and leave us alone? “i don’t like this kind of post so mods need to remove it and ban people for posting it” is baby shit

                  • JohnBrownNote [comrade/them, des/pair]@hexbear.net
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    6
                    ·
                    7 months ago

                    pigpoop

                    i already did but surely you understand that my blocking a comm because i think it’s a bad idea and bad for the culture doesn’t change my opinion on it. and that my ability to block it doesn’t have shit to do with my pointing out my position as a contradiction of your argument.

    • BountifulEggnog [she/her]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Is the fruit somehow higher if the person has more followers? I honestly don’t understand.

      A post is higher effort the more eyeballs the original had?

      • QuietCupcake [any, they/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        7 months ago

        Yeah, part of the problem with these rules is that there’s no good way to draw a line between what’s low-hanging fruit and what’s a legitimate target for hexbear dunking. The rule relies on the mood of the mod present at the time of posting.

      • FunkyStuff [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        7 months ago

        Yeah? We had people posting casual transphobia and casual racism here in the early days, heavy moderation put an end to that. Obviously bad posts and bigotry aren’t comparable but you get the idea, moderation is like cyberbullying but with institutional power; and if we’ve learned anything from the posting wars it’s that bullying works.

        • buckykat [none/use name]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          7 months ago

          That’s not really comparable. Racism and transphobia are actually bad and ideologically opposed to the ideals of the site, making fun of bad opinions but with numbers that are too small under them is not. Getting rid of people who post racism and transphobia is a good thing to do, but are you actually suggesting banning low-hanging-fruit-dunkers?