Cuban revolutionaries, including Fidel Castro (far left) and Che Guevara (center), in Havana in 1960.

On this day in 1959, U.S.-backed Cuban dictator Fulgencio Batista fled the country following the victory of Fidel Castro’s 26th of July Movement (M-26-7) at the Battle of Santa Clara, marking the successful conclusion of the Cuban Revolution.

The 26th of July Movement takes its name from the date of with a failed attack on the Moncada Barracks in 1953, however, the movement bearing this name was not formally organized until the attackers were released from prison in 1955. Public resistance continued sporadically until November 1956, when 80 members of the M-26-7 returned from exile.

Soon after landing on the island, a separate revolutionary group, the “Directorio Revoluncionari Estudiantil” (DRE), unsuccessfully attempted an attack on the Presidential Palace in Havana.

Throughout 1957, armed resistance from groups such as the DRE and M-26-7 would escalate. After a failed offensive by the government against rebels in the summer of 1958, the rebels launched a major counter-offensive.

On December 28th, 1958, after a fraudulent election in favor of Batista, revolutionary forces reached the city of Santa Clara. Seizing equipment from an armored train intended to transport government reinforcements, the rebels quickly captured the city, prompting Batista to panic and flee to the Dominican Republic with a personal fortune of more than $300 million.

In the following days, revolutionary forces entered Havana with no resistance, and Castro established a provisional government. The 26th of July Movement later reformed along Marxist–Leninist lines, becoming the Communist Party of Cuba in October 1965.

Batista later settled in fascist Spain, dying there in 1973 at the age of 72.

Megathreads and spaces to hang out:

reminders:

  • 💚 You nerds can join specific comms to see posts about all sorts of topics
  • 💙 Hexbear’s algorithm prioritizes comments over upbears
  • 💜 Sorting by new you nerd
  • 🐶 Join the unofficial Hexbear-adjacent Mastodon instance toots.matapacos.dog

Links To Resources (Aid and Theory):

Aid:

Theory:

    • Le_Wokisme [they/them, undecided]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      3 months ago

      Fidel was homophobic! they say, never mind that his contemporaries were people like ronald reagan and thatcher, but he actually acknowledged his wrongness and apologized to the community.

    • FunkyStuff [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      3 months ago

      If I drank, it would be funny to go on that thread drunk. Even sober it’s good entertainment. There’s a guy now saying “Marx and his allies believed Communism can’t come about by force” which I think can just endlessly be dunked on.

      • LeninWeave [none/use name, any]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        3 months ago

        “Marx and his allies believed Communism can’t come about by force”

        How can a person possibly come to this conclusion? There are multiple incredibly famous quotes that obviously contradict this idea of Marx and Engels being peaceful reformists even if you read no theory. “Under no pretext should arms and ammunition be surrendered”, “have these gentlemen ever seen a revolution”, etc.

      • Cowbee [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        3 months ago

        People really do make up whatever random bullshit they want rather than reading Marx. It amazes me that people feel totally fine just pulling that out of their asses with no basis.

        • FunkyStuff [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          3 months ago

          And it’s like, why lie about this? You can just… not be a Marxist if you don’t like Marx. It’s not like Perón in Argentina where everyone has to be a Peronist, Marx’s name is a bad word and makes you less popular. So I really don’t get why they want to claim Marx in the first place.

          First paragraph of State and Revolution etc etc

          • Cowbee [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            3 months ago

            Yep, the man is blunted by liberals throwing everything they’ve learned by osmosis through their own myopic frame of analysis, making assumptions that don’t hold.