If you base your opinions on what other people hallucinate
When I say “real world context” I mean the culture and history that shaped and continues to shape our existence, not what some fascist losers are saying online.
if you can’t examine the work on its own terms then you’re wasting your own time
No human being is capable of doing that because creative works don’t spring from the ether and neither do we. If you think you can somehow partition your brain to engage with a work completely divorced of everything you’ve ever known and experienced of the material world, you’re fooling yourself.
Have you considered that the chuds are mad about the Frieren memes and are coping in the dumbest ways possible?
Why would they get mad about the memes if they didn’t like Frieren to begin with?
You’re tailing the chuds and letting them dictate your opinions on a work of fiction
“Many people interpret this work in a fascist manner” is evidence for the claim “this work lends itself to a fascist interpretation.”
When I say “real world context” I mean the culture and history that shaped and continues to shape our existence, not what some fascist losers are saying online.
No human being is capable of doing that because creative works don’t spring from the ether and neither do we. If you think you can somehow partition your brain to engage with a work completely divorced of everything you’ve ever known and experienced of the material world, you’re fooling yourself.
Why would they get mad about the memes if they didn’t like Frieren to begin with?
“Many people interpret this work in a fascist manner” is evidence for the claim “this work lends itself to a fascist interpretation.”