• Onno (VK6FLAB)
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    ·
    edit-2
    16 hours ago

    It’s charming that the article uses Fahrenheit as a scientific temperature scale, perhaps they should adopt bananas for distance in scientific reports too.

        • invalidusernamelol [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          54 minutes ago

          I like fahrenheit for temperature “feel” because 100° is close to body temperature and is also “very hot” when used for outside temp while 0° is “very cold”.

          100°C is “you are boiling” and 0°C is “pretty cold, but not that bad”.

          For any calculations or representation of temperature outside the context of human activity though, Celsius is way better.

    • SpiderFarmer [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Could be a communication thing. As much as I love the metric system, for frontfacing stuff like articles, scientists have to sometimes use freedom units.

      At least that was my experience with school.

      • trinicorn [none/use name]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        edit-2
        12 hours ago

        how so?

        arbitrarily setting the freezing point of water to 32 and the boiling point to 212 and then filling in the rest from there isn’t what I’d call “making sense”

        I guess they’re 180 apart but why 32, why not 0 and 180?

        • blunder [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 hours ago

          I think it’s more about common ambient temperatures we encounter than the freezing point of water. 0 F is absolutely freezing, 100 F is hellishly hot, 50 F is pleasantly cool.

          Now for scientific use it’s fucked

          • trinicorn [none/use name]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            2 hours ago

            eh, that’s all so vibes based and varies so widely by climate as to be meaningless IMO. its like saying meters are less intuitive than inches and feet because a meter is too big and a centimeter is too small to be human scale. Boils down to what you grew up with IMO

            I actually do think it’s “better” in one way that isn’t completely vibey though: 1 degree F is a lot closer to the difference in air temperature that humans will notice, so especially for like, indoor air, its nice to have that extra resolution to see the difference between 68, 69, 70 F without using a decimal point.

        • combat_doomerism [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          12 hours ago

          the freezing point was set to the freezing point of brine, not water. doesnt make a lot of sense, but it makes more sense than inches -> feet -> yard -> mile (not to mention league etc.) what the fuck is an inch? who fucking knows, maybe the distance between your knuckles on one of your fingers??? the point is not that farenheit is good, but that the rest of the imperial measurements are even worse

          • trinicorn [none/use name]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 hours ago

            yeah, I mean some eutectic brine of ice, water, and camel piss salt seems pretty scienticious to me

            if anything, three barleycorns laid end to end might be more sensible lol

        • CloutAtlas [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          12 hours ago

          As someone that learned Celsius first, I can intuit Fahrenheit pretty easily in a day to day setting. Can’t imagine doing science with it though