It is a concern, I just don’t know how it’s meaningfully enforceable at scale. Just like OSA. What do you want me to do about it personally?
I never supported the idea.
Piefed.social Staff
Community owner of !television@piefed.social and !obscuremusic@piefed.social
It is a concern, I just don’t know how it’s meaningfully enforceable at scale. Just like OSA. What do you want me to do about it personally?
I never supported the idea.
Is your argument really “this won’t affect linux, so it doesn’t matter” ? At the very least, FOSS development by anyone in California will be a problem, as the law quite literally names “persons” as potentially liable.
I’m taking the position that this is largely unenforceable at a software and OS level beyond larger players that come from California or specifically do a lot of trade in California.
The reality remains, the US is the most thirsty for this kind of thing. Not the least.
This specifically is quite different to most other efforts. Not sure if it might get constitutionally tested.
Windows, and any other OS will be illegal in California unless it implements this.
Right, as I said - I just don’t see how this is meaningfully enforceable. It’s a complete farce. It’s on the level of the Online Safety Act it being enforceable.
Apple, for one, is headquartered in California.
Oh, I forgot Apple. Sure.
But there are many other OS. How on earth can they credibly enforce this?
Did you not read my comment? Anyone writing software for an OS that implements this, can be sued (in California) if it ignores the API signals from the OS and allows access to age-restricted content.
Yeah, this is just not meaningfully enforceable. Big companies will follow, but it would mostly be ignored by everyone else.
Yes, but if the OS was not designed in California and you are not based in California (you’re not Windows, basically) - I fail to see how they can meaningfully compel anyone to follow this. Moreover, even if an OS somehow could know the users age - that doesn’t automatically mean all other software that exists automatically reads it and responds to it as necessary.
Does the law compel anyone making software to recognise this?
Whether they do so optionally is a different thing entirely, to be fair.
I’m not even sure how that is remotely enforceable, although this also is a somewhat different thing to what this thread is about.
It’s added now. Just kept saying “not found” when I tried to pull it in.
@rimu@piefed.social this community doesn’t seem to want to add to piefed.social.


Lemmy/Piefed is far more resistant to bad actor community capture by a capricious moderator. Instance admins are usually far closer to the day-to-day operations and thus have their pulse on their communities in a way that reddit admins do not. Secondly, the federative nature of it means that any community can be replicated elsewhere.
Piefed


You are on lemmy.world
You can see the instance others are on by the @ after their name. If they don’t have one, they are local to you.


The problem was that they launched with barely any mod or curation tools, and haven’t really added anything since. Rimu, just one guy, should not be having a better development cycle than something like Digg after launch - especially when most of the things they need to add are pretty basic currently.


It doesn’t. You can identify as Taiwanese and still think that Taiwan and China are one.
Sure, but it is indicative - that’s the point. And in actual polling specifically, when you omit status quo - 25% of people in Taiwan want to “move towards independence” as opposed to 8% who want to “unify”.
I think it’s pretty apparent that most Taiwanese people, whether or not they believe in a ‘one China’ or not don’t want to live under the PRC, and additionally don’t believe it’s really plausible to retake the mainland under ROC control.


@rimu@piefed.social This would have been a rimu decision.


Yes, it’s relaunched.


Making an account and subscribing to it on every instance.
But someone has uses lemmy-federate and done it for you, so now it should be visibly mostly everywhere.
You may want to also use !newcommunities@lemmy.world and !communitypromo@lemmy.ca too if you want to reach every possible instance by alerting people on them.


Don’t worry, I’ll end it now. You’ll never be able to reply to me again. Bored of this now.


I’ve looked before, sure. Modlogs are publicly viewable on the Fediverse, so this doesn’t take long. Also, that’s not the definition of an ad hominem. Just giving you my assessment of your behaviour based on your conduct.


I didn’t claim there that I had specific evidence. Just explaining the major difference in history between the two things.
The “cats and dogs” thing is more comparable to COVID scare comments about asian people during 2020-22 period.
In comparison to Europe/UK/AUS which is far further along this road (and implemented social media age requirements), absolutely. Also, apparently it’s just a checkbox as far as this particular California law goes.