

What’s the benefit of not referring to ICE as ICE? What they’re doing should reflect on the organization as a whole. They should not get to say “well they weren’t our agents, I don’t know what you’re talking about.”


What’s the benefit of not referring to ICE as ICE? What they’re doing should reflect on the organization as a whole. They should not get to say “well they weren’t our agents, I don’t know what you’re talking about.”


Inb4 “just get a GrapheneOS phone.”


At least open the article next time.


WHO ARE YOU TO ACCUSE ME


I’m sorry Jon…
What have you done,
Now it’s 80087,
You monster.


Thank you. This should be said often to the workers of the entire world. Fuck the overlords and their exploitation.
Excuse me, horse leads troops.


He was a union man.


Sorry, I’m pretty new to the Fediverse, so I probably did it wrong. Hoping someone will correct me, but in the mean time I’ll quote the person whose comment I meant to link to:
Some of the test sites don’t differentiate between random and unique. They may see a randomized fingerprint as a plausible unique user, but it may be different the next time you visit. Other sites may detect that your browser has taken steps to randomize your fingerprint, and use that as an identifying piece of information on its own (power user vs average joe)


deleted by creator


I’m not sure, but I believe PumaStoleMyBluff’s reply may describe the issue.


I use CanvasBlocker.


Well not with that attitude.


Okay but why is it relevant that you anal?


Dumpsters have 100 times more style and class than the cybertruck.


I was never a big fan of Voyager, story-wise. But the theme is amazing.
But that creates a distinction the people in charge can use to deny what’s happening. Now and in the future. “It’s a small group of bad apples, most ICE agents aren’t like that.” Etc. It’s all of them. The whole agency has to go. For that purpose, I think continuing to just call them ICE is useful.