• 0 Posts
  • 97 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: July 2nd, 2023

help-circle

  • The Egyptians have Ramses

    Uh? Ramesses was human - all 11 of them were. Egypt has the likes of Ra, Osiris, Anubis and so on, who I don’t think are particularly tyranical in their stories.

    For China, the actual mythology stuff is a lot of creation myth, but they do have a few stories about a divine emperor crushing an army of demons, and it turns out a lot of that is actually about conquering less developed, more nomadic cultures to unify China (Japan pretty much did the same, creation myth then crushing foreign demons that are actually literally foreigners not under their rule). And then there’s the whole mandate of Heaven that they used to justify dynasties rising and falling, mixing up history into myth, that began when a government that started well ended up being seen as tyranical after a few centuries (the Shang, ending with Zhou and Daji).

    Older, more primordial mythologies just start at world creation myth, and then talk about humans figuring out how to settle the land, and how the universe works. Mesopotamian cultures mostly focus on defeating the forces of nature, which does involve standing up to violent gods or monsters, but that comes from trying to build up a civilization that can survive disasters, and is actually not tied to tyranical human rulers. Any civilization needs to start with things like water control, that’s why everyone from China to Greece also have that. Sumerians specifically have cities that go to war with each other because “the chief god of their city told them to”, which is obviously manipulation to secure resources, but isn’t particularly tyranical against their own people. And then the Bronze Age Collapse happens, after which the myth of Ishbi and Erra shows a war god who gets petty and kills everyone because people didn’t pay attention to him. So again, the stories of tyranical gods come from people trying to survive and explain destruction events, from nature or from outside forces. When the Assyrians go around killing everyone, Sennacherib destroys Babylon out of anger and frustration - he tries to write a story about the god of Babylon ordering him to do that, and another story of his own god putting the same god of Babylon on trial for some crime, but that doesn’t stick and Sennacherib gets murdered.

    At some point it’s not easy to distinguish mythology and simply literature. For China specifically, Journey to the West and Investiture of the Gods talk a lot about the bureaucracy and hierarchy of the Heavens, the oppression of gods and demons - but they’re 16th century novels, are they really mythology? Those stories clearly became popular because people felt oppressed by tyrants, so the myths about tyranical gods can of course be a reaction to the people experiencing tyranical rule. Sun Wukong’s story famously starts because the various systems of the Heavens can’t contain him (and mankind), only Buddha can - but then that’s still a 16 c. novel that showed up long after the creation of Buddhist “mythology”, its spiritual structure and divine figures.

    So there’s multiple reasons for stories to pop up about gods becoming tyrants, either because the people get upset at actual tyrant kings, or because one country tries to justify the destruction of another country. But there’s a distinction to be made about stories written as piece of literature and when they become actual civilization building myths that is a fundamental part of its culture. The older a civilization develops and gets centralized, the more opportunities you get for anyone to write more stories that become myth a few hundred years later. If that civilization has ups and downs, the stories about gods are more likely to reflect that. (I think Egypt got out of that because it actually collapsed 3 times, and kept starting over with new gods doing the same things, none of the unified kingdoms lasted more that 500 years)


  • the people of Europe showing that unlike their governments, they do not tolerate genocidal apartheid supporters

    I don’t know the details for each country, but as a Western European, it seems to me that apart from Germany, European governments are generally trying to distance themselves from Israel more and more, so there’s that. I can’t tell what each country does in details and in facts, but it’s the impression I’m getting. I know France has taken a couple punishing actions like banning them from an important military sales show and calling for a ban on weapon sales. Anyone knows if other countries have done similar things or the opposite?


















  • The ending theme already shows the main team, it’s just Goku, Vegeta, Bulma, Piccolo, Shin, so another 3 people in the second ship. I guess Kibito should be needed because he knows how to get to the demon world, but he’ll probably stay back with both ships and not come along (unless Bulma turns it into a capsule first).

    Glorio learned about the Z team and Gomah’s wish by spying on him, yet he claims he heard everything from another demon king. It’s a very odd lie, he doesn’t want them to know he was spying? We don’t know why he was spying on Gomah in the first place, or if he does come from another demon realm at all, but I expect simple politics between demon realms at this point; if not, he’s looking for something by himself and everything is a lie. Other than that, I think Shin is just overly suspicious because Glorio is a demon: Glorio never met any of them anyway, he shouldn’t know that anything changed. It may be odd that they are kids (or look like kids at least), but he shouldn’t have anything to compare to anyway, so Shin shouldn’t have a reason to get suspicious - if not for the fact that we know he’s right and Glorio is lying for some reason.

    Gomah might be a threat but he doesn’t look like final boss material. He might have more political power than actual power, and he’ll probably serve to move the plot, like with that third eye thing. The doctor sister is more suspicious, Shin just doesn’t know she’s involved yet.