It’s not that Tesla didn’t choose to have it tested, the agencies haven’t wanted to test it yet.

They don’t test every vehicle and they don’t always test what they think will be low volume vehicles.

Teala could sponsor it, but it’s not like every manufacturer sponsors a vehicle that the testing agencies decide not to test.

For example, I don’t believe the model 3 highland has been tested again after all the changes, and if it has, not all the testing agencies yet.

I saw a recent article that’d be great for their first

https://reason.com/2024/11/11/mom-jailed-for-letting-10-year-old-walk-alone-to-town/

But… it does have crumple zones.

The entire front and rear castings are designed to shatter in a high energy collision and crumple.

The size of a crumple zone isn’t as important as how it absorbs the energy and dispenses it.

You could have a 20foot crumple zone that’s empty and it’s be useless.

You can see it crumpled here. They’ve also posted a different video on the official X account of a crash test but I won’t post that to avoid linking them. here.

Since you got something so utterly basic wrong and posted it as true, I can only assume the entire post is fabricated.

Edit: took a screen shot instead of video. It crumples all the way past the front wheels

I was kinda hoping it’d always stay like this.

A lot of us walked/biked to our grade school as well. I can’t remember which grade I started walking, but I was definitely doing it in 4. I’d wager even grade 3 but can’t be 100% sure.

That’s what you need distress codes for.

Destruction of evidence is a much different crime.

I would suspect it’d no longer be legal to hold them indefinitely and instead at best get the max prison sentence for that crime instead.

A us law website says that’s no more than 20y as the absolute max, and getting max would probably be hard if they don’t have anything else on you.

You’d have to weigh that against what’s on the device.

Also, even better if the distress code nukes the bad content, and then has a real 2nd profile that looks real, which makes it even harder to prove you used a distress code.

If they have all of congress they could impeach, convict and then trump could sick the DOJ on him and the conservative courts would then find a way to bypass it being an official act and jail him.

I’m not sure how much it would actually help for a regular thief.

This is about protecting it against more sophisticated attacks. But the rest probably have those means if wanted.

I’ve never said otherwise.

It’s their job to find a way to hack into the phone.

This feature makes that even harder.

Right, but this is about them bypassing you entirely.

They don’t need your fingerprint or pass code if they can bypass it themselves. This feature protects you when they’ve seized it lawfully which can be for many reasons.

That’s all lawful.

They can search you and the area when arrested. They can search the car if they have probable cause that evidence will be in the vehicle

I said have a warrant or seized lawfully, not nust have a warrant.

Edit: I didn’t even write what I said I said correctly. Corrected it lol.

They usually do have a warrant or it was seized lawfully.

This is about keeping them out even when it’s lawful.

It’s not the same.

On an iPhone it’ll reboot after X hours of no use. That means it could go months without rebooting and the day after it’s in police hands it reboots.

The feature you’re talking about would need to be set to reboot every day at a specific time. Now you personally have to deal with that. Also until you unlock the phone as well there could be reduced functionality making it annoying.

Very different.

They can only send what’s been allocated, and maybe a little wiggle room on certain things, but otherwise congress would need to approve it. They’re already trying to make sure they use up the last of what was allocated before the end of the year.

You Either Die A Hero, Or You Live Long Enough To See Yourself Become The Villain.

I like in the article how it says they’ll get some time to reformulate, but if it doesn’t work, they could just turn off the widget inserting it and bobs your uncle!

Supposedly he couldn’t give the resources to anyone else as they were gathered for a biden/Harris campaign.

Since Harris was part of that there was no problems with her taking it over

Probably some kind of fraud otherwise. Collecting funds for a different purpose.

That’s why they also wanna get rid of critical thinking skills.