It might be referring to the relatively archaic ethnographic/anthropological term?

Like the Pisces is supposed to center objects of significance/power in their sexuality, or something?

I have to assume this is some kind of satire on blanket assertions within astrology, otherwise I have no idea how you justify or even begin to consider assigning a 12th of all births as having some inherent necrophiliac tendency?

And repeat that for the other truly horrible ones.

I have to wonder if writers when deciding to create a fictional character, kind of just think about the minimum reasonable age to have achieved whatever is required for their story position.

Leaves you no blank stretch of time where you gotta wonder what the hell they were up to.

The specific critiques I saw when just skimming people talking about it don’t even seem that unbelievable.

Like they said something like the game is too obnoxiously handholdy with tutorial dialogue and also they thought Luigi was basically an annoying obstacle to manage rather than a partner.

Now I haven’t seen the game yet so I can’t tell if that’s true but that just seems like plausible things that a Mario and Luigi game might fuck up.

A lot of the hate was probably just nostalgia rage combined with Ava being kind of the annoying bratty kid archetype and doesn’t really do anything except talk at you on comms in a game that already has way too many annoying people on your comms all the time.

But really she’s far from the worst character in that regard, it’s just that the more annoying characters like Vaughn are shielded by being returning characters and also not a girl with short hair dyed blue or whatever. Basically just became the easiest target to complain about.

Doesn’t actually address the content of the words he spoke, just appeals to the content of his soul and innermost thoughts.

Sadly they haven’t invented a way to observe those parts of a person yet so this doesn’t mean anything.

That looks like curiosity rather than fear.

There’s like one German general that people generally know about and he’s literally the one that didn’t understand logistics and also got involved in a coup plot.

His last sentence literally just sounds like the hasbara claiming that Muslims have a fundamental hatred in their blood against Jews.

Also with the moronic anti-communist talking point comparing political ideology to religion.

I’m sorry but this is just wishful thinking and active whitewashing, sure he doesn’t say Sinwar individually killed 1,200 “innocents”, but he says Sinwar masterminded the attack that killed 1,200 “innocents.”

The only way history will show that Bernie had a good heart is if someone donates him a new one, where is the good heart in calling IOF soldiers innocents? He is treating Israelis as ontologically innocent.

It’s a fundamental issue, Bernie showing his ass on it either means he considers Israelis ontologically innocent, or he is deeply lazy and dishonest figure who abandons any gesture towards integrity to instead appeal to American fascism.

You can move a pot or pan around pretty well on an induction, the only annoyance comes with dogshit “smart” features that beep and turn stuff off automatically without your control.

I think there just plain is a valid argument for both personal and collective safety to move away from open flames and inflammable gas supplies in average homes.

That literally does just look like what people do when hunting if they aren’t interested in doing anything with the innards, it’s simpler to get everything out right away so that there’s no risk of contamination.

I’d say that assuming this is near a regular walking route its definitely some extremely bad manners from whoever did it in that case though. It’s one thing to leave stuff out where it’s safe to assume other animals will get to it, but near where regular people walk is nasty.

Apparently there isn’t supposed to be hunting around there, but the alternative scenario in that case surely would be that some other animal carried it there or whatever. What sort of supposed satanic ritual just coincidentally leaves a set of internal organs that look identical to when a hunter is trying not to puncture anything and get nasty organ stuff all over?

I think this kind of anti-African panic has been long simmering in the UK too, I recall reading about a 2002 case where the remains of a young black boy were discovered in the Thames, and the “loony” opinion was that it was satanists, while the measured and reasonable opinion printed in shit like the Telegraph was that it was probably “African witch doctors”

Aside from that, the organs in the attached photo just actually look intact and relatively unremarkable aside from not being inside of an animal, surely the only thing you could test for in that case would be if stress hormones or similar are built up, which could be any kind of pain and stress, or like if they find weird poison in a stomach?

Whatever chuds are mad about with the SH2 Remake is definitely not caused by the project being treated like art, maybe besides the grander point but that game is a capital P product.

Really they should be happy they get a game designed from the outset to provide the player with x amount of gameplay for the price tag.

Well yeah, but it’s more about the principle of it, he’s supposed to be a ZA/UM old guard and that was part of his value in being in the documentary, so it’s not as if being fired should be a radicalizing moment.

Basically I think he appears a bit too flexible, the radical rhetoric comes off leaning more towards branding than deep principle.

I don’t really remember that tune coming out of Tuulik when he was still holding on to ZA/UM during the documentary lol.

Pretty big shift from meekly suggesting that maybe Kurvitz could get a license to keep writing in the Elysium world.

But whatever, they are making video games, time will tell if it will be interesting or not.

I’m probably a bad person to try and explain what to look out for in the remake compared to the original because I think the remake fundamentally has boring generic design for the gameplay. I think the original game has a unique experience with the atmosphere and the general traversal of the world, with the camera oftentimes deliberately forcing you to head towards unknown areas that you can’t fully scout ahead of time, and a lot of the moment to moment scares within the gameplay rely on that, also it uses wide angles to emphasise isolation in a lot of the outside areas while using close ups to emphasise the cramped indoor spaces.

As far as the combat gameplay goes it does seem like that’s more of a draw for you so I definitely see how Signalis would work better, and the new remake might work better just by virtue of following very blatantly in the footsteps of RE2 and RE4s remakes with tactical locational damage as a pretty critical part of crowd management, from what I’ve seen.

And people still attempt to “reclaim” totalitarianism as an idea for the left to use lmao.

Extremely funny that Man with a Movie Camera has orchestral score snobs among it’s fans when the film actually just is edited like a modern amateur(positive) music video.

Like if you go between the different uploads on youtube with the “cinematic orchestra” score(modern) and a trad score, the trad score comment section is full of people being smug as hell.