pastermil@sh.itjust.works to Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · 1 year agoAny of you ever played with IPFS?message-squaremessage-square9fedilinkarrow-up12arrow-down10file-text
arrow-up12arrow-down1message-squareAny of you ever played with IPFS?pastermil@sh.itjust.works to Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square9fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareSkull giver@popplesburger.hilciferous.nllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-21 year ago[This comment has been deleted by an automated system]
minus-squareLocustOfControl@reddthat.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 year agoThat seems to be a pretty serious set of problems.
minus-squareSkull giver@popplesburger.hilciferous.nllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·edit-21 year ago[This comment has been deleted by an automated system]
minus-squareLocustOfControl@reddthat.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoAs a user, I don’t want to share my downloaded images if people can use that to datamine my Lemmy browsing, so I wouldn’t use it. Yes, instances could do the bulk of the sharing, but then that’s just downloading and rehosting images with extra steps. Something like Veilid would be more interesting.
minus-squareSkull giver@popplesburger.hilciferous.nllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·edit-21 year ago[This comment has been deleted by an automated system]
[This comment has been deleted by an automated system]
That seems to be a pretty serious set of problems.
[This comment has been deleted by an automated system]
As a user, I don’t want to share my downloaded images if people can use that to datamine my Lemmy browsing, so I wouldn’t use it.
Yes, instances could do the bulk of the sharing, but then that’s just downloading and rehosting images with extra steps.
Something like Veilid would be more interesting.
[This comment has been deleted by an automated system]