Seems quite promising! I heard it could use more maturing.

  • ttt3ts@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
    2·
    1 year ago

    Trash. I tried to download a few TB of images on it and it has horrible performance.

    • It trashes spinners
    • it’s garbage collection is delete everything. No joke when you have more than x GB they just delete everything to reclaim disk space. I ended up using ZFS volumes and just nuking the disk as it was faster.
    • Networking code is garbage with no limits.
    • CPU hog
  • Brickfrog@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
    2·
    1 year ago

    I tried it out a while back but wasn’t too impressed, it still has a ways to go. During testing what I did was write a script to pin (aka “seed”) any public torrent downloaded in qBittorrent into IPFS. My goal was to see if anyone ever found/downloaded my pinned content via the available IPFS search engines.

    But the reality is that the available IPFS search engines were crap, they sound nice in theory but are so bad at finding/indexing anything. It was rare that anything I had pinned in IPFS would show up in a search engine let alone someone find it & attempt to download it themselves. There’s still a lot of work to do.

    The IPFS software itself also had a lot of performance/memory leak issues, I never could get it to run long term before it crashed & I’d have to figure out how to restart it or wipe its data & start over.

    The other issue is that the IPFS project sort of feels like it’s treading water. The IPFS devs went on to create Filecoin & seem more focused on that nowadays. Think of Filecoin as IPFS + cryptocurrency, so you have the privilege to pay people to pin/host (“seed”) your data. And to top it off the Filecoin version of the IPFS network is incompatible with original IPFS network. Funny since it’s the same devs but also is a bit illuminating that they purposely designed it that way.