His win is a direct result of the Supreme Court’s decision in a pivotal LGBTQ+ rights case.

    • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Glad we agree that we don’t want an unbounded freedom from responsibility.

      But I mean if you don’t force people to serve the entire public you risk some presumably unwanted consequences. Should a whole grocery chain be able to say no blacks? What if it’s the only one in the town? Should realtors be allowed to refuse to sell houses to non whites? What if that means all the black people get forced into one part of town, and coincidentally that part has shitty services and other unwanted traits?

      Is the rule “as long as there’s alternatives it’s ok”? Separate but equal was already decided to be unequal.

      On the other hand, I do want to be able to refuse service to Nazis. Maybe the key is naziism is wholly something you choose. But I also don’t want people to be able to refuse service to, like, union members.

      There’s no universal “anti social behavior” metric, unfortunately, I don’t think.