• Hexboare [they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    59
    ·
    4 months ago

    After construction of the experimental reactor started in 2018, most of the scientists involved in the project abandoned their holidays – they worked day and night, and some stayed on site for more than 300 days in a year.

    That’s not ideal

    • DefinitelyNotAPhone [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      67
      ·
      4 months ago

      Not that I’d ever support throwing your work-life balance into the meatgrinder like that, but if I had a job trying to create one of the best potential options for long-term power production while the world was setting itself on fire from fossil fuels I might consider 50 hour work weeks for a bit too.

    • comfy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      57
      ·
      4 months ago

      My instinct is, “please don’t allow sleep deprived people to operate an experimental nuclear reactor, even if they want to.”

    • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmygrad.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      45
      ·
      4 months ago

      Seems like might be a case of them really wanting to see it work. Most jobs don’t really have any meaning beyond a paycheck, but this is a rare case of work being genuinely meaningful and interesting.

      • KurtVonnegut [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        4 months ago

        Yes, honestly there is a big difference between being forced to work long hours by a corporation and choosing to work long hours because you are passionate about something, or in a “flow state,” or you feel like you have a real stake in the outcome of the project. I am sure during the Space Race there were scientists on both sides pulling insane hours, driven largely by national patriotic pride, which might also be at play here. I don’t think there’s anything wrong with workers working for long hours as long as 1) it is voluntary, 2) it is safe both physically and mentally, and 3) it is temporary, for only a year or a few years, with an enforced return to a 40-hour work week at some cutoff point.

      • Hexboare [they/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        4 months ago

        I did see something about how a lot of the hydro plants in the US are becoming woeful understaffed because there is no appetite to hire staff and very few people have the appropriate training anyway

      • aeshna_cyanea@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        4 months ago

        Guessing you’re Russian based on the handle but this was also a thing in the Soviet union even in the 30s, there were cases of people wanting to work too much that their boss had to force them to take time off. It just lowers your productivity in the long run

    • IHave69XiBucks@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      Its actually pretty common in China for employers to provide housing accomodations to their employees. So my guess is they had some sort of apartment complex on site that people were using. They werent like sleeping in their offices.

        • IHave69XiBucks@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          Being an hour and a half away actually makes it make even more sense theyd sleep there to avoid a commute.

          My guess is the top right building is housing. You have 2 gate houses, one just to the main building and one to that side building. Would make sense if researchers were living in that side building that there would be visitors or maybe even family living with them there that they would want the extra gate for. Since they wouldnt be allowed inside the main building.