• lud@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Sounds good to me.

    I actually prefer the MIT license too. It’s more open.

    • zagaberoo@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      14 hours ago

      More open strictly in that it allows free software to be rolled up into proprietary software.

      • lud@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        38 minutes ago

        So what? Some people just want to make stuff that helps other people.

        A more open license is a way to accomplish that.

        IMO it’s weird to complain that someone makes their thing even more open source.