For those who are unaware: A couple billionaires, a pilot, and one of the billionaires’ son are currently stuck inside an extremely tiny sub a couple thousand meters under the sea (inside of the sub with the guys above).

They were supposed to dive down to the titanic, but lost connection about halfway down. They’ve been missing for the past 48 hours, and have 2 days until the oxygen in the sub runs out. Do you think they’ll make it?

  • Almostarctic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    The 5 submariners chances of being rescued are very slim at this point but much much higher than the 500 migrants still missing off the coast of Greece who took to the waters not for a joy ride but to escape war and seek a better life.

  • stewsters@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 years ago

    I suspect they imploded.

    These super deep subs are traditionally not reused very long, because the stress of the water pressing and then releasing weakens them. The more compression-decompression cycles they take the faster they degrade.

    From all the reports, they got a lot of reports of issues that they ignored. I read that one of the reporters who saw it found it to be very jury rigged together. Apparently it was not certified in any way.

    Even if they did survive and the ballast worked correctly, they would surface quickly (decompression sickness?) and cannot open the hatch from the inside. The thing doesn’t float above the water, so its going to be a pain to find. Also they didn’t paint it bright orange with blinking lights, its white, gray, and blue.

    Overall, a lot of poor decisions and ignoring advice lead to disaster.

    • RickRussell_CA@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 years ago

      Even if they did survive and the ballast worked correctly, they would surface quickly (decompression sickness?)

      Decompression sickness is a concern only if they suffered compression. But the main problem, as I see it, is that the sub was made from materials that are famously brittle and tend to degrade over many cycles of pressure and release (resin, carbon fiber, etc). So the likely failure mode is catastrophic failure of the sub under pressure.

      There’s a reason most deep sea stuff is made out of steel: it’s somewhat ductile and recovers from compression with minimal change in properties.

    • hydra@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      Also these depths are usually only explored with unmanned drones, not makeshift tuna cans with store parts

    • WhiteHawk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      Not an expert, but I don’t think the air pressure inside the sub changes, so decompression sickness should be impossible. Don’t quote me on that, though

      • fixmbr@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 years ago

        This would be correct. However, I suspect the air pressure in the sub did change. Very rapidly.

    • Overzeetop@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Of all the various ways to provide emergency rescue assistance, it appears that they’ve included almost nothing which would help them in the event of an underwater failure that prevented surfacing (i.e. emergency ballast release failing).

      Apparently it was not certified in any way

      My understanding of this is limited to the two paragraphs on CNN, but there is a process for “classing” vessels. The owners decided not to do so as the process only certified that the vessel itself is safe for use, and does not verify the procedures for operation or the training of the crew. Their logic for not classing was that most ocean failures are the result of poor procedures or poor crew decisions, ignoring entirely that the reason most failures fall into those to cases is because the vessels themselves are vetted (via the classing process) to eliminate the hardware as a failure mode. It’s almost poetic that the man in charge of that decision is on the craft.

  • hydra@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 years ago

    Sadly I don’t think so. This incident was absolutely preventable. Someone warned them about this and they got fired. A makeshift vessel that wasn’t inspected/certified, immersed to almost 3 times the rated depth, controlled by a wireless Logitech gamepad from 2010 with no redundancy and only 96 hours of oxygen. I really really hope for a last minute miracle though…

  • Faresh@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 years ago

    I’m a bit confused that this is receiving so much attention. What’s so special about this case compared to all the other cases of people being lost at sea every year, besides them being rich?

    • linearchaos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 years ago

      Honestly, this case is somewhat extraordinary, in a deeply disturbing way.

      First there was this amazing quote from the CEO who is missing on the craft right now

      “You know, at some point, safety is just pure waste,” Rush told CBS’ David Pogue during an episode of his “Unsung Science” podcast. “I mean, if you just want to be safe, don’t get out of bed, don’t get in your car, don’t do anything. At some point, you’re going to take some risk, and it really is a risk-reward question.”

      Second, aside from being made from questionable experimental materials, the sub was being controlled by an old, off brand xbox controller. There were numerous design and safety issues that were known at the time of departure. They kinda just did whatever in the F they wanted to. It’s a millionaire game of Fuck Around and Find Out and they’re not used to finding out.

      Third, the damage waiver

      The disclaimer, read out by CBS correspondent David Pogue, read: “This experimental submersible vessel has not been approved or certified by any regulatory body, and could result in physical injury, disability, emotional trauma, or death.”

      A nervous-looking Pogue makes a face and says, “Where do I sign?” in the footage recorded when he went on the $250,000 (£195,000) trip to see the Titanic at the end of last year.

      I get that it’s just some rich idiots (and one of their kids) crossing the river styx, but it’s not very often you see such amazing disregard for basic safety.

      • Cynosure@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        I don’t get why the Logitech controller is so focused on. I get that it’s probably not the right controller due to it’s age and wireless only nature but COTS parts are often more reliable than in-house ones. The lack of certification as you mentioned is a much larger issue.

        • linearchaos@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          Any game controller, would be insufficient to put 5 peoples lives in danger.

          If you were going to use a game controller to do so anyway, you’d use one that can be easily replaced, maybe something manufactured in the past decade. That F710 is old (2011) and honestly didn’t rate all that well compared to other controllers of it’s time. It’s wireless, adding needless risk.

          The certification is all part of it. The control systems need to have backups. The gamepad aspect is interesting because it’s blatantly spitting in the face of safety which seemed to be the CEO’s style anyway.

          Would it have been better than a new xbox controller? I’m not sure, perhaps not if it the new one was at least wired.

            • zeppo@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 years ago

              I wouldn’t trust that controller for a dungeon run in the Elder Scrolls Online and here’s this dude visiting the Titanic in person with one. They did say he has backups on board, though.

          • Otakeb@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            I work on robotics and drones for the military and we use game controllers for teleoperation all the time. There are some times we use more rugged and robust controllers, but they are essentially just expensive, yellow Playstation controllers with e-stop buttons on the bottom (look up Fort robotics controller).

            I think you’d be surprised at how often the military uses game controllers for mission critical tech. The convergent design of game controllers has kind of solved the problem of minimal, handheld, input-output machines that are capable of commanding difficult procedures.

              • Otakeb@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 years ago

                I don’t operate anything in the field but I design and build the stuff. Fortunately, I haven’t had to build any weapon systems or combat vehicles yet because I also have some moral apprehension to that as well, but I try not to shame those who do work on that stuff if I can avoid it. It’s a pretty standard meme that wide-eyed aerospace engineers with dreams of space travel get stuck designing missiles to pay the bills. I’m sure there’s not that many engineers in weapons tech that wouldn’t switch to rockets or self driving cars in a heartbeat if they could afford to and had an in.

                • Dexies@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 years ago

                  Hey I appreciate the honest response. I was being a bit of a dick and I feel bad now. Peace.

    • Double_A@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      It being so completely ridiculous. If a boat sinks, it just sinks… bad luck.

      But this was some crazy person using some jerry-rigged submarine and then rich people actually trusting that.

      • trainsaresexy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        They did have money but the people involved Tham Luang cave rescue didn’t and that received a ton of attention. Similarly with the Chilean miners stuck underground for 2 months. You also have Kathy Fiscus (an old story but well known at the time) and Nutty Putty caving incident. There is no shortage of similar stories about people getting stuck in places that received wide attention.

        The fact they are they rich is only really influencing where they ended up and how they got there.

    • barfplanet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      It’s mostly the being rich thing.

      It’s really sad that something like this gets so much news coverage and international support, while poor people are facing similar fates and we all pretend it’s not happening.

      I understand the news coverage. These are folks who are relatable to a lot of western audiences. People aspire to their wealth. The international support and rescue efforts though are a little shameful. You don’t see this kind of efforts when it’s migrants fleeing war and oppression.

      I see the attention on the war in Ukraine similarly. What Russia is doing is shameful and I’m glad Ukraine is getting so much help. At the same time Yemen has it much worse. Hardly anyone even knows there is a war happening there, but it’s American built bombs that are dropping on neighborhoods. They’re not quite white and relatable enough to get us all putting their flag on our Twitter profiles.

    • FinnFooted@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      More mysterious. Spookier. Generally more novel. Like you said, people get lost at sea all the time. People rarely get lost thousands of miles below sea.

      • KneeTitts@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        One thing I can say is if they ever do find the sub intact, its very likely these guys recorded their last hours on their phones and we are very likely to see that at some point… talk about nightmare fuel.

      • Ben@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Nah, it’s only 4km. If they weren’t lazy billionaires, they’d get out and walk home.

  • AliLunaCat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 years ago

    At this point, I think they have less than 24 hours of air left, so I highly doubt they’ll be alive when/if the sub is found

  • Double_A@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 years ago

    No. Chances are high that that submarine just imploded in a millisecond and they just instantly died. Why else would it stop sending pings and completely dissappear otherwise?

    • Willer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      I cant speak for myself but i think communication in general is a very well understood topic. If that fails you can just assume everyone is dead. I am not sure if the banging is real tho or if it was something else

      • KneeTitts@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Power failure is my guess too, then they would have just drifted down to the bottom and froze to death in a few hours. Terrible way to die.

    • pineapplefriedrice@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      I would also say that I don’t think people SHOULD be risking their lives at this point. We’re looking at a case of people who took an informed risk and understood that there was danger associated with the recreational activity they were undertaking. These people either had vast monetary resources and could have consulted the best experts in the world, or had significant prior experience and knowledge. While obviously withholding information interferes with informed consent, and that may or may not have played a role, I don’t think this is morally equivalent to rescuing someone from a burning building. There’s also simple probability - the odds of rescuing them alive and well aren’t good, and to put someone else’s life at risk for the off chance that they succeed would be unethical in my opinion.

    • MashingBundle@lemmy.fmhy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      Wow, it’s confirmed. Honestly so grateful they had an immediate and painless death. Imagine sitting in complete darkness for 4 days waiting to suffocate.

  • Donjuanme@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 years ago

    A couple things are potentially different from how op laid them out. (From my understanding)

    The vessel was designed to automatically begin resurfacing after a set period of time underwater, even without pilot input, so it might not be very deep at all. The problem is it doesn’t sit very high in the water and is very hard to see.

    They don’t necessarily have 2 days of oxygen left, those were calculated values, and there may be other gaseous build ups that impair the totally oxygen supplies.

    I hope it was over quickly for them, I don’t know how you could resurface that type of vessel without breaking it. I hope we will find evidence and be able to piece together what happened, but I suspect it’ll just be lost at sea. I don’t think there’s any conspiracy up keep evidence away from the public, I think most people underestimate how difficult it is to find 4 cubic meters inside a 10 cubic kilometer area, hell that would be hard without that area being covered in water.

  • Noedel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 years ago

    It really depends on how they went. Sudden implosion of the hull, quick and easy.

    Floating around for days until your air runs out, wondering if someone will find you… Not so much.

        • TheYang@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          depends if they can get rid of the carbon dioxide.
          if there’s a constant low carbon dioxide atmosphere in the sub, they’ll suffocate peacefully, as humans can’t detect lack of oxygen, just too much carbon dioxide.

          That’s why you go moronic in a decompression in an airplane, body doesn’t get enough oxygen, but can get rid of the carbon dioxide, and you don’t notice you’re suffocating

    • Airazz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      People tend to care more about the stuff that happens closer to them, or is somehow related to them. You probably don’t care all that much about the armed conflict in Mali between the government, ISIS and Wagner Group.

      • duringoverflow@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        if you live in europe, the Mediterranean sea is you know, right next to you. And way much closer than the distance of the titanic to the shore in America, which is about 1000 nautical miles.

        • Airazz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          I don’t know anything about Mali, which is closer to to me than Titanic, but I do know a lot about the Titanic.

    • WhoRoger@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      I don’t disagree, but missing sub is an unusual phenomenon and mystery that gets people interested.

      I don’t think the billionaires part is all that important, I didn’t know about it until today. The Kursk, the kids trapped in a cave, the miners that have spent months in a mine, those were all news too.

      But yea immigrants from war-torn regions - nobody cares unless they have “blond hair and blue eyes”.

    • Very_Bad_Janet@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      The Greece tragedy is lacking the irony and hubris of this.

      I mean, it’s a tourist submersible that was aiming to bring billionaires to view the Titanic wreckage and it likely got wrecked itself. And they named the submersible Titan.

      The sub’s company OceanGate was dinged by a former employee for all sorts of safety issues and they fired and sued him. There are also lots of choice quotes from the CEO (who happens to be on the vessel) about moving fast and breaking things, and regulations stifling innovation. So there’s some possible karma involved.

    • Gxost@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      I think it’s because the story about a missing submersible is unusual, and moreover, it’s about a rescue attempt. This makes it more interesting than many other, albeit more dreadful, news stories.

      • duringoverflow@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        sure. It has nothing to do with the fact that in one of cases they are 5 billionaires while in the other one they are 750 poor migrants. No, totally not.

        • berkeleyblue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 years ago

          Not entirely no, I didn’t see any news outlet leading the story with “5 Billionaires missing after Submersible lost contact”. For quite some time we didn’t even know who was on board. It’s more the fact that boats in the Mediterranean sink all the time, it’s still tragic but we know that that’s an issue we have now (most people unfortunately seem to have decided that they do not care that much). A submersible going missing and the coast guards of 2 countries looking for them, while thei only have air for a couple days, no one knowing where they are and it involving the titanic guarantees clicks, it’s almost like a movie plot. The fact that they are wealthy is certainly not the reason for it though, it’s the circumstances surrounding it, it’s unusual. People also know how ships work and why they capsize, while most people don’t have the slightest idea how deep sea submersibles work.

          So yes, the ship capsizing and killing that many people is horrible and should get more attention, especially from the Goverments involved. It’s ridiculous that we let those poor people drown by the thousands and treat the ones who made it like scum. But I’m not convinced the Titanic story got traction BECAUSE the victims have money.

        • thekernel@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          The Thailand cave rescue was all over the news and they were poor.

          Its about novelty, nothing more nothing less.

          A bunch of rich ppl have died on Mt Everest this year, nobody gives a shit as its a common occurrence.

      • vegivamp@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        750 people drowning is also unusual, and there’s also been rescue attempts.

        All these victims have loved ones, and i don’t wish death on anyone, but for the billionaires I find it quite hard to care much.

        I still hope they’re saved, though; and if they are I very much hope the experience will have changed them.

        • Kantiberl@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          That’s just not the same. Drowning is quick and if you don’t save them immediately they’re most likely dead. Slowly suffocating in a sub while the clock ticks and something can be done about it is a different story.

          Learn to care.

          • vegivamp@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            You’re assuming they’re suffocating, when the smallest fault in the hull’s integrity would make the thing implode, killing them before they realized what was happening.

            Like everyone, my ability to care has limits. You can’t worry and care about everything. I’ll give my fucks for those who didn’t grow rich exploiting others, thanks.

  • xuxnx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    depends on if its o2 depletion or implosion

    the second one is quick and easy. the first one would be tough. imagine dying breath by breath. most people aren’t afraid of death, it’s the dying part…

    • Fosheze@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      That depends on if their CO2 scrubbing lasts longer than their O2 supply. Your body can’t actually feel a lack of O2, the feeling most people associate with suffocation is actually your body detecting a build up of CO2 in your blood. If they can keep scrubbing the CO2 out of the air after they run out of O2 then they’ll just start to get lightheaded, kind of drunk feeling, tired, and eventually just pass out and die. You actually barely feel it happening which is why O2 sensors are so important when working in poorly ventilated confined spaces. I know this first hand because I work with bulk liquid nitrogen and I’ve damn near knocked myself out a couple times via an inert gas cloud. One moment you’re perfectly fine, then you just start to black out and it dulls your senses so much that you don’t even have the brain power to process what’s happening. Them running out of oxygen more slowly will extend that process a bit but it still isn’t a painful process and the thought numbing effect from your brain running out of oxygen keeps it from even feeling particularly alarming.

      So as long as they can keep scrubbing CO2 then at least they won’t die a particularly “unpleasant” death. That is assuming the sub didn’t just pop from pressure like you said.