• UnpluggedFridge@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    7 months ago

    Travelling forward in time could also kill everyone… Our adaptive immune systems are developed somatically and purifying selection is nonzero in humans.

    • Obi@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      7 months ago

      Right I think if some bloke brought me some OG plague from the 1200s, my body would have no clue.

      • genuineparts@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        7 months ago

        Yeah but equally that original plague bacterium has no clue about antibiotics and no resistances. So you’ll be fine. As probably will be people in the Future. Or they died out without you anyway.

        • RGB3x3@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          7 months ago

          Oh boy… Here I go, I’m so excited to see the year 2100! Goodbye everyone! Alright, hit the switch!..

          Did you do it? Why’s it not working? Oh no. There’s no terminal there… What have we done?

  • vic_rattlehead@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    7 months ago

    Yes but NOT traveling back in time to cause the black plague results in all kinds of worse timeline shenanigans.

    • 9point6@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      7 months ago

      There’s a few of these

      I think the biggest one for me is quite how much support Hitler apparently had in the Anglosphere before the wars.

      Assuming he managed to grow that support without war, I have a feeling we would have potentially had a very fascist 50s across the world instead of the era of progressive politics we actually got. Then whatever inevitable revolution or nuclear winter that followed a couple of decades later, would leave the world looking very different to today.

        • oce 🐆@jlai.lu
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          22
          ·
          7 months ago

          He would not have managed to get any support if it wasn’t for the hate and scapegoating, he’d be some unknown good guy.

          • DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            That simply isn’t true, contemporary sources make it clear that he had charisma to spare. The Weimar Republic was ripe for a radical populist movement due to a number of reasons, but that means a less hateful ideology could have succeeded as well. The period balanced on a political knife edge, and who knows what would have happened if he’d been a true believer in something actually helpful?

  • fireweed@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    7 months ago

    Oh shit, is that why nobody attended the 2009 Time Travelers party? No one wanted to be the person who killed the great Steven Hawking

    • SeabassDan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      They knew waaaay more than the rest of us did at the time, you don’t wanna get MeToo’d for a party you went to 100 years ago, do you?

      • DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        7 months ago

        The guy who speaks with a computer that reads his cheek movements is probably a good candidate for falling under “celebrities they flew in to provide a smoke screen.”

        I feel safe in assuming Hawking wasn’t actually tied into an oligarchal pedophile conspiracy.

  • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    7 months ago

    A similar argument could be made for making first contact with an alien species. There’s a decent chance one or both species carries some form of microscopic life that the other has no defenses against, assuming both species can even survive in the environment necessary for the other.

    Not only will starship captains and crew not be able to have sex with the hot aliens they meet, “they have an nitrogen/oxygen atmosphere” won’t mean the away team can land without environmental isolation suits. Planets with oxygen in their atmospheres might be the most dangerous ones out there for us.

    • hihi24522@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      I think chirality is something most people overlook in those situations too. Even if you found a world of beings exactly like you, a perfect earth with plants and low CO2 concentrations, if their proteins have opposite chirality to yours, you’re probably going to die of prion disease.

      “Oh look a perfectly human person on an earth like planet I’m sure I can take my helmet off”. Nope. You just inhaled spores or skin cells or pollen or viruses or literally anything that contains “misfolded proteins” and if any of those get at all digested they could cause your body to produce more misfolded proteins, a cycle that will eventually lead to your demise.

      “Look this plant isn’t poisonous” chirality is harder to check than chemical makeup. So yeah it has vitamin B but is it the kind that could kill you? (We don’t have to worry about this much on earth because basically all life on this planet makes and uses proteins of similar chirality)

      “Wow that alien sex was great” too bad there were skin cells in saliva you both exchanged/ingested (or proteins in other bodily fluids) so you’re both going to die now.

      Worst part is that prions are really slow acting. You could all be chilling in this wonderful earth like home for months until around the same time you all suddenly get sick and die. There’s no cure, so there’s nothing you can do besides leave a warning for the next crew who might stop by.

      Oh and the same dangers go for native life on the planet too. To them you’re made of misfolded proteins so any scavengers who eat you and maybe even predators who eat them have a chance of developing and spreading prion disease. Your bodies are basically bioweapons. Any earth crops or animals you brought with would be biohazards too.

      • BreadOven@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        7 months ago

        Prion diseases are not as simple as coming into contact with a protein composed of D-amino acids.

        While it’s still not fully known, it’s generally one specific type of protein PrP^C that gets transformed by PrP^Sc, converting the C to Sc, and so on.

        D-amino acids also occur naturally on earth.

        As for B vitamins, none include proteins as far as I remember, they’re all small(ish) molecules like biotin and folate. Also having a difference in stereochemistry with most of these vitamins, wouldn’t cause toxicity.

        Obviously there are some cases of small stereochemical changes being toxic (thalidomide). But generally small changes won’t automatically make something toxic.

      • brianorca@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 months ago

        Prions wouldn’t work like that. They would have to be very similar, and the same chirality, as our own proteins, or else the misfold would not self-replicate like prion diseases do.

    • kraftpudding@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      I personally trust humanity that we will work out a way to have sex with something we shouldn’t rather quickly. Our horniest scientiest and our brightest perverts will find a way, even if it’s at great personal cost.

      • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 months ago

        Yeah, it is probably going to be one of the top 5 reasons to join a starship crew, so life will probably, ah, find a way. For all we know, NASA might even have a focus group working on this already.

        BUT that doesn’t mean it won’t lead to the extinction of one or both species involved.

    • usualsuspect191@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      7 months ago

      There’s a decent chance one or both species carries some form of microscopic life that the other has no defenses against

      I’d argue there’s essentially zero change we’d be biologically similar enough for any microbes to bridge the gap. It’s a big deal when microbes jump species here on earth

      • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        That’s the result of a balance between different microbes and their own defensive measures. Entirely novel microbes and biological functions could overwhelm all of that. Hell, if they have just evolved a next level ATP, they could have access to an order of magnitude more energy than our microbes and bodies can use, in which case we’d probably have no chance unless it doesn’t recognize us as food.

        It’s not guaranteed to happen, but with 0 data about alternate evolution trees, any reasoning about the odds is speculation (including my use of “decent chance”).

        Edit: This would be the case for viruses. Unless they work very differently or our biochemistry has some convergent evolutions, alien viruses should be harmless to us and vice versa. Just like the hundreds of viruses we are exposed to with every breath, most don’t react to our cells any differently from how they’d react to wet rocks.

    • oce 🐆@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      7 months ago

      Not only will starship captains and crew not be able to have sex with the hot aliens they meet

      Not so fast, we do have some convenient barrier device to avoid contamination in this context.

      • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        7 months ago

        I guess it’s possible to have safe alien sex with a full body latex suit and respirator. Though maybe think twice if the alien has sharp spike features.

    • Sizzler@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 months ago

      Can you explain more about the last sentence how planets with oxygen might be the most dangerous please? I’m interested

      • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Oxygen is reactive enough that free O2 doesn’t tend to stay that way. Even to us, too much oxygen is toxic because it starts reacting with things we don’t want it to inside our bodies (which is why antioxidants are beneficial). The presence of oxygen in an atmosphere implies there’s life producing it (or maybe some other process we aren’t yet aware of). It can also imply that there’s also life using it to keep it in a balance that doesn’t freeze the planet or allow it to destroy any life because oxygen producers keep pumping more of it into the atmosphere.

        And the danger part comes from a combination of alien life maybe having microbes our immune systems can’t defend against and the possibly of picking one of those up and bringing it back to other human settlements before the carriers realize they have a fatal infection.

        That second part is what makes it more dangerous than a ship accidentally flying into a star or trying to land on a gas giant, which would probably be fatal to all aboard the ship but not dangerous to humanity as a whole. Even just entering an oxygen atmosphere with a ship that never lands could be bad if that ship must later return home.

  • taiyang@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    7 months ago

    Now that I think of it, if you can teleport or time travel and only you go but not the things on you (as is the case with pickier stories)… losing your clothes would be the least of your worries if the countless organisms didn’t also go with you on the trip.

    Goodbye, gut biome!

    • JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      7 months ago

      Sounds like philosophy of identity. What is you? Is only things with your DNA you? Will a bunch of dead hair, skin cells, and nails teleport with you? Are the things inside your body you? Is only your brain you and it will get transplanted into a new body in the future?

  • Allero@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    7 months ago

    No, due to Earth constantly moving you’ll end up in space

    -Physics

    • JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      7 months ago

      You’re just knowledgeable enough to know that Earth moves, but not intelligent enough to know that there’s no absolute reference frame it moves in respect to.

      If you don’t continue travelling with the Earth along its path when you time travel, you could literally end up at any random point in the universe, unless you pick a different, arbitrary, body to move in reference to.

      • dovahking@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        But the universe is also constantly expanding. So the frame of reference becomes obsolete because it’s at an entirely different point in space now.

      • PsychedSy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        Throw thousands of satellites back in time but each offset. Measure when you get a broadcast from them and how far back you sent them and bam, we find out for reals.

      • Björn Tantau@swg-empire.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        Then there’s you who forgot that we actually do have a universal reference frame with the cosmic microwave background.

        • JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 months ago

          The CMB is everywhere, and anywhere in the universe it’s the same distance from a hypothetical observer. I fail to see how you can use it as an absolute reference frame.

          • ulterno@lemmy.kde.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            7 months ago

            I think they’re trying to say, it can be considered to be a non-accelerated reference frame, where stuff like planets and stars would be accelerated.

            Though I have a problem in understanding how it could be taken as a reference frame in the first place.

            • JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              7 months ago

              Indeed, it can’t be a reference frame, as even if it’s not accelerated, it’s everywhere, so it doesn’t have a position or orientation.

              • ulterno@lemmy.kde.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                7 months ago

                Not only that, it’s not even a single object. It’s just the name given to a group of radiation, which is ultimately just light going randomly here and there.

          • Björn Tantau@swg-empire.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            It isn’t a single “thing” you are some distance away from. It’s photons remaining from the early universe that can be found everywhere without direction. Pick “one” of them and you can track your speed relative to it. It’s the closest thing we have to a universal reference frame.

            Also see the later questions on https://www.astro.ubc.ca/people/scott/faq_basic.html

            Edit: I’m stupid, photons move at light speed of course. But you can detect a colder and hotter side of the CMB and use that as a reference frame.

      • Allero@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        Nah, I know the thing with reference points, but that’s a matter of navigation and relativity.

        In reality, a point in space is a point in space, like, a specific “pixel” of the Universe (oversimplified) that might be occupied with something or not.

        We just can’t anchor this point since we don’t know what reference is absolute and the laws of physics can be applied to every inertial reference, so this doesn’t help.

        • JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          It’s not that we don’t know which reference point is absolute, but there are still absolutely defined ‘points in space’, it’s that there is no absolute reference point, and so there are just ‘points in space’ relative to whatever arbitrary body you decide to make your reference frame.

          • Allero@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            Then we have to define what body serves as a reference point. “Relative to the observer” doesn’t seem to work here, since we try to decide where should the observer themselves go.

            If so, then why should it be Earth? Why not the Sun, or the center of a Milky Way, or literally anything else? As you said, it’s arbitrary. And how do we choose the reference frame?

            Doesn’t make any sense outside spacetime as a whole.

    • xkforce@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      People say this but the reality is that you are already traveling through time and you aren’t teleporting into the space where the Earth used to be. Just as traveling backward would essentially just reverse that process. i.e unless you specifically design a time travel device to kill you that way, thats not how time travel works.

      • I think a time travel device would, itself, need to be a spaceship anyway. And since it would have to travel FTL to achieve time travel in the first place, getting back to where Earth is at that point in time shouldn’t be difficult.

      • Allero@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        If your time machine works this way, if you’re not isolated from reality while you travel, you’ll have to do everything at crazy speeds and potentially backwards and you’ll be limited by the age at which you’re reasonable enough to be able to travel back. You won’t be able to travel to times when you don’t exist as a person.

  • Phoonzang@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    To be less hypothetical and more scary: Think about all the ancient pathogens that are dormant in the permafrost. Those could become a real problem when it starts to thaw because of global warming.

  • SuiXi3D@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    7 months ago

    This is (kinda) part of The Witcher books. Ciri hops universes and gets stuck on Earth during the black plague. When she hops back to her own universe, she unknownly takes a bit back with her, thus starting the Catriona plague on The Continent.

        • JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          Alright, I’m sure you’re more familiar with it than me. But side point: could Andrej Sepkowsky not have thought of a slightly more creative name for Ciri’s world than ‘The Continent’? Also, does that refer to just that continent on the world, or also islands like Skellige, and any other undiscovered continents on the same world, such as their equivalents of America and Australia?

          • SuiXi3D@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            7 months ago

            Probably, but as far as I’m aware ‘The Continent’ as a name only came into being with the awful Netflix show. But yeah, the name supposedly just references the whole of The Witcher world as of the end of the last book. As far as I’m aware, nothing was ever written about other continents by Sepkowsky.

  • credo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    7 months ago

    I’ve felt this would be similar for generation ships. If our civilizations get met up again, everyone would probably die.

  • iknowitwheniseeit@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    7 months ago

    Funny but diseases usually become less virulent over time. A successful disease generally doesn’t harm the host too much.

    Ebola doesn’t spread far because it quickly kills the carrier. The COVID-19 pandemic was basically ended because it mutated into a less dangerous variant.

  • BeefPiano@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    7 months ago

    This is addressed in The Rise And Fall of DODO. There’s a whole decontamination quarantine period for time travelers.