• verdigris@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      I still don’t see a single actual advantage of W11 over 10. The OS drains more system resources so it’s less performant, and every other “feature” I’ve seen looks like a double edged sword at best, or an anti-feature at worst.

      • fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        The OS drains more system resources so it’s less performant

        I have had literally the exact opposite experience. Performance is better, “resource usage” is more or less the same, and most importantly battery life was like 50% better (still awful on my machine, but less bad).

      • Buelldozer@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        I still don’t see a single actual advantage of W11 over 10.

        From the user’s perspective there really aren’t any. MS could have stopped with W10, or even W7, and things would have been just fine.

    • mipadaitu@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      7 months ago

      Only if you absolutely need Win11 features. There’s very little at work that I actually need a Windows computer for, I’d do way better with a Linux desktop.

      Office 365 is fine for some people, but all I need is a plaintext editor, SSH capabilities, and a couple HTTPS communications utilities. LibreOffice would be fine for the few documents I need to share, most of the rest is a git wiki.

      • wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        7 months ago

        Did you miss “in the office”?

        Most people don’t have a choice, their OS is decided upon and managed by their employer.

        Plus, there’s definitely benefits to using the most popular setup if you have to interact with the normal business side folks more. LibreOffice’s cross compatibilty with Microsoft formats can still be sketchy with some of the more complex features.

        • mipadaitu@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 months ago

          I certainly didn’t miss “in the office.” For my office use, at a very large corporation, I personally have no need for Windows at all. None of the people on my team have a need for Windows.

          My entire team would be more efficient with a Linux desktop.

          OF COURSE my team doesn’t have a choice. OF COURSE most people who work at a mid size or larger corporation don’t have a choice. But we ALSO don’t use Win 11. The implication in the original comment was that it was a recommendation, but that definitely wouldn’t be the best recommendation for everyone.

          The only reason to use Windows in a corporate environment is because that’s how it’s always been done. That’s changing though, because a lot of executives want Macs now, cause it’s the new shiny thing. Maybe that’ll start allowing other choices down the chain too.

      • unalivejoy@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        I do all my work inside WSL anyway. I only use Windows at work because that’s what IT gave me. They also offer macbooks.