• db2@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        So you mean “those with the least ability to lead”. Yet Trump is still somehow running and he can’t even wipe his own ass.

      • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes he is. His military decision making was thankfully shit, his hatred of Jews caused a brain drain ahead of the war; nuclear research wasn’t prioritized because it was considered a “Jewish science”. Also his rearmament of Germany was completely unsustainable and would have collapsed the German economy if not for the onset of the war. Effective demagoguery =/= successful leadership.

        If I set out to make a thousand year empire that only lasted 11 years would you consider that successful leadership?

          • entropicdrift@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Okay, so to be clear, your critera for “great” leadership doesn’t include any sort of decision-making skills nor effective delegation when said leader is out of their depth?

            If I worked at a company that had leaders making a long series of bad calls at a tactical and/or strategic level, for instance, I shouldn’t call that “bad leadership”?

    • ZeroGravitas@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Wow that’s even scarier than what I had in mind. Good intentions all the way down.

      The fucked up thing about humanity is that we invented our own destruction, put a shiny red button on top and wrote on it “do not touch”. As if there would ever be a scenario where pressing it would make sense. And seeing the rethoric coming out of Russia these days, I can’t help but wonder. Damn, I guess this is what my parents lived with at the height of the Cold War?