Custom built bicycle by World Bicycle Relief NGO which provides Bicycles to underdeveloped, mostly rural, areas

More to be found at https://worldbicyclerelief.org

I’m too cynical to advocate for or against the NGO itself on account of not having researched it enough, It’s founded by the SRAM owners (that being a bicycle parts corporation) and they have a for-profit subsidiary which just sells you that bike, but they claim some of it goes towards the actual charity. Seems an ok model.

But the idea seems, genuinely, pretty good. You give someone a rugged-ass bicycle that can be fixed via local parts instead of some dependance on anything else, they now have a pretty good bicycle and boy does that beat walking. Forgive me the obvious bias here but it feels, at least theoretically, pretty Sankara-esque, it’s just instead of a tractor, it’s a bicycle. Different use-case, same philosophy.

Especially that 100kg carry capacity rear rack, I mean goddamn. Most “adventure” bikes you can customer purchase in the west end at around 40 - 50kg on that front. Kind of want one now.

According to their own numbers they’ve given out 752.000 bicycles at about 150€ a pop.

EDIT: It also comes very close to the Apocalypse Bicycle that I posted about as the Humanitarian Bicycle idea about 2 years ago and that was from some guy just designing it for fun

What do we think?

  • appel@whiskers.bim.boatsEnglish
    3·
    11 months ago

    Looks good, but I always think when I see a “new” thing released to fix a problem, why does it have to be brand new, manufactured and shipped there. There are hundreds of unused bikes rusting away in tips, why can we not repair those and send them? You would probably need new tyres, brakes and perhaps a new chain, but the frames should be fine. Many chunky steel frames exist on old mountain bikes, city bikes, touring bikes etc. rear panniers are easy to attach with aftermarket parts.

    Speaking of chains, for maximum durability I think a belt would have been better, but that is also not very common so less repairable.

    E: thank you anticlockwise for the criticism, and you are completely right. I guess this view comes from a place of overproduction and waste. I see hundreds of forgotten bikes and then people can also not afford a bike, but that is capitalism. I see all of this stuff that could be in perfect condition with an hour of work and a few spare parts. I guess what is the best way is to reuse our waste here, and build these bikes that are more resilient for the more demanding conditions. I think you blocked me, but thank you nevertheless.

    • anticlockwise [love/loves, she/her]@hexbear.netEnglish
      2·
      11 months ago

      oh my god white people are something else

      yes, hypothetically we could send impoverished black people in the third world who have practically no carbon footprint whatever random rusted old bikes with no parts standardization instead of doing anything to reduce our own massive consumption of fossil fuels. what the fuck would it accomplish? do you think the low cost steel bicycles they might pedal around are meaningfully contributing to climate change? is it just fun to deprive others of things hypothetically? is it a ritual?

      where do these ideas and thoughts come from? how do they enter your mind and why does no critical kind of process happen? why do I encounter them?