Is it simply over-correcting in response to western anti-communist propaganda? I’d like to think it’s simply memeing for memes sake, but it feels too genuine.

    • ThirdConsul@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Mhm. I get that your country is hostile to the world and its own citizens. I do. But that doesn’t make Stalin - or any era USSR - good. This dichotomy of white vs black, good vs evil is the most USian brainwashing that is afflicted on your people. From your post I can see you preemptively dismiss any critisizm or argument and while you said MLs don’t idealise Stalin, it seems that you do.

      Those who denounce Stalin entirely, also denounce the USSR, and existing socialism.

      I’m from Poland. To us, to a country betrayed by the Allies and sold to Stalin, their occupation did not bring prosperity, or equality, nor socialism. We were systematically robbed by the USSR from the wealth, intellect and industry (as noted by then governments and listed as a plea for USSR to stop), and even lives. We were made to take loans to invest in the Empire, while staying a satelite country and tying our planned economy to better native Russian territories. We did call then the Red Army - Red Locust. You need to realise that when you glorify it, you automatically dismiss our traumatic past. It is like getting told by a stupid child that if we’re hungry we should eat cake.

      Since USA wages war outside its territory and was never invaded nor conquered, you might not know that trauma - especially from war and being a conquered nation, worse nation - is transgenerational https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transgenerational_trauma

      Were there people who thrived under USSR occupation? Yes, but they are thriving currently too, both politicians and capitalist leeches. Did Poland progress under the occupation? Yes, like every damn other country in Europe. We would progress more as free people, no historian thinks differently.

      The latter, Stalin’s policy positions, are largely either contextualized and explained, rather than actively defended, or are genuinely good feats

      When I read your comments I can’t not see you as anything else than a guilt feeling nepo baby. Or at least someone so privileged, that they never ever thought about other people lives outside of statistics. An empty headed academic.

      Tl; dr; the revolution was made into abomination of itself and claiming otherwise is blindness

      • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 month ago

        Mhm. I get that your country is hostile to the world and its own citizens. I do. But that doesn’t make Stalin - or any era USSR - good.

        The USSR was good based on its own progressive merits.

        From your post I can see you preemptively dismiss any critisizm or argument and while you said MLs don’t idealise Stalin, it seems that you do.

        I don’t.

        I’m from Poland. To us, to a country betrayed by the Allies and sold to Stalin, their occupation did not bring prosperity, or equality, nor socialism.

        I’ve spoken to people from Poland that have the opposite to say. The fall of socialism in Poland brought a dramatic collapse in any kind of left, which is why Poland is so far-right today.

        We were systematically robbed by the USSR from the wealth, intellect and industry (as noted by then governments and listed as a plea for USSR to stop), we were made take loans to invest in the Empire, while staying a satelite country. We did call then the Red Army - Red Locust. You need to realise that when you glorify it, you automatically dismiss our traumatic past. It is like getting told by a stupid child that if we’re hungry we should eat cake.

        Again, I’ve heard much the opposite. That’s why anecdotes are terrible measures of truth. The collapse of socialism in Eastern Europe brought skyrocketing poverty rates, prostitutuon, drug abuse, homelessness, and 7 million excess deaths.

        Since USA wages war outside its territory and was never invaded, you might not know that trauma - especially from war and being a conquered nation - is transgenerational https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transgenerational_trauma

        I’m aware.

        Were they people who thrived under USSR occupation? Yes, but they are thriving currently too, both politicians and capitalist leeches. Did Poland progress under the occupation? Yes, like every damn other country in Europe. We would progress more as free people, no historian thinks differently.

        And yet Poland is now in a far-right spiral with far greater disparity.

        When I read your comments I can’t not see you as anything else than a guilt feeling nepo baby. Or at least someone so privileged, that they never ever thought about other people lives outside of statistics. An empty headed academic.

        Cool story, you know nothing about me. Believe it or not, statistics and historical fact do outweigh simple anecdote, and the idea that I have never thought about people’s lives outside of statistics is deeply wrong.

        • ThirdConsul@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 month ago

          Splitting this to a separate comment because it was too long:

          The fall of socialism in Poland brought a dramatic collapse in any kind of left, which is why Poland is so far-right today.

          I mean dude, not even close. Polish leftist parties were antiworker from the 90s. Anything further left was dismissed as “USSR was saying the same lies”. Fool me once kind of thing.

          Add to that the short time where there was upwards mobility in the country when it first became “capitalists”, as well as fhe fact that in the past 20 years median personal real wealth grew.

          And yet Poland is now in a far-right spiral with far greater disparity

          Yup. The current generation is seeing that the wealth is unequally distributed (1% owns 45% of wealth), as well as all those rentier leeches, banks making record profits year after year, and the Facebook/Tiktok ( or generally USA right wing) propaganda is turning like 10% into MAGA-style idiots, and the rest is also slowly radicalizing. We do see that in the below 35 age group the left-leaning is still strongest, but the PIS and Konfederacja are following Repulican party strategies and gaining tracktion.

          • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 month ago

            So in other words, the far-right used the standard red-scare playbook to purge communists and socialists, and now Poland has immense disparity and is entirely controlled by the far-right.

            • ThirdConsul@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              1 month ago

              No, don’t hyperbolize. This isn’t your narrative.

              the far-right used the standard red-scare playbook to purge communists and socialists

              No. It was everyone in the free Poland. We were rebelling constantly under USSR occupation.

              and now Poland has immense disparity and is

              No. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SI.POV.GINI?locations=PL&start=1985 But we do see foreign corporations leeching from us and actively enshittifying. The home ownership rate is decreasing.

              and is entirely controlled by the far-right.

              That depends what you mean by far right. I’d call the current political landscape of Poland as right-centrist PO in coalition with centrists (the rest of the coalition) vs (oppositon) right-centrist PiS with (growing) republican-clone Konfederacja

                • ThirdConsul@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  The Polish economy was hit particularly hard by the 2008/2009 crisis.

                  ??? We’re famously the only country in the EU that wasn’t affected by it. Please be critical of what you read.

                  What a garbage article you sent here.

                  Further, disparity in Poland is high,

                  I literally send you a credible source that shows its similar to 1985 year. Are you saying that it was high during USSR occupation or ignoring the source?

                  • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    9
                    arrow-down
                    3
                    ·
                    1 month ago

                    From the source linked:

                    EU membership ought to have been a boon for Poland, a country which in 2004 was still recovering from the dead years of communism. Access to Western European markets ought to have supercharged that recovery.

                    Initially that is what seemed to happen. Between 1992-2004 the Polish economy more than doubled in size from just under $100billion to $250billion, according to the World Bank. Between 2004 and 2008 it doubled again to peak at $500billion. But since then Polish GDP has flatlined.

                    Of course the global recession of 2008/09 affected all economies yet for the Polish economy to be a little smaller in 2015 than it was in 2008 is a shocking indictment of EU membership. The EU has managed to turn a high-growth economy into a stagnant one.

                    Why was Polish GDP flatlining? Why did millions leave Poland?

                    I literally send you a credible source that shows its similar to 1985 year. Are you saying that it was high during USSR occupation or ignoring the source?

                    Not only is the gini coefficient misleading, but it only goes back to 1985 in your source. Upon the adoption of capitalism, Poland has had unstable growth to even flatlining, is now being sold out to foreign companies, and again, has purged its left in favor of the far-right.

        • ThirdConsul@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 month ago

          What anecdote? I’ve made no anecdotes? The only person mentioning any anecdotes is you, e.g.

          Again, I’ve heard much the opposite

          Regarding USSR stealing industry:

          https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grabież_i_przejmowanie_mienia_poniemieckiego_na_Ziemiach_Odzyskanych#%3A~%3Atext=Grabież+i+przejmowanie+mienia+poniemieckiego+na+Ziemiach+Odzyskanych+–+Wikipedia%2C+wolna+encyklopedia

          (I’m sorry wo don’t really translate that to English). But you can try to Google for sources in English.

          I’ve spoken to people from Poland that have the opposite to say

          You might’ve spoken to people who remember the late 80’s fondly. Not 50-70s. Or ZOMO (secret terror police) or similar, they always had privileged lives.

          Unless you were in the Party, Army or Zomo, life was not roses at all, e.g. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polish_October

          The collapse of socialism in Eastern Europe brought skyrocketing poverty rates, prostitutuon, drug abuse, homelessness, and 7 million excess deaths.

          1. Poland is not Eastern Europe

          2. prostitutuon, drug abuse, homelessness <- you might be confusing that with what is common in the USA.

          3. Excess deaths https://wol.iza.org/articles/mortality-crisis-in-transition-economies/long#%3A~%3Atext=Features+of+the+transition+mortality%2Climited+changes+in+family+stability.

          4. skyrocketing poverty rates

          Not really, no? After we detached from the ZSSR everything had to be restarted and the first decade was hard. We had to start from little, figure out export routes, rebuild a damn lot of industries etc? We were economy attached and made dependant on USSR, how could the split not be hard?

    • Riverside@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      God, I’ve been reading your exchange with ThirdConsul and it’s painful. I’m sorry you have to endure this shit.

      If you want an additional reference to the USSR actually subsidizing the Polish economy, Szymanski’s “Is the Red Flag Flying” goes in detail about this, and proves with economical data that 1955 onwards the USSR subjected itself to the short end of the stick of unequal exchange and provided raw materials to the COMECON countries at international market prices and below in exchange for industrially manufactured goods. Some nationalist Poles are to a certain degree aware of this and instead of framing the exchanges as “dismantling of Polish industry” as this clueless user is doing, speak of “the USSR giving us useless iron and taking finished industrial products from us”, completely devoid of any understanding of high value-added goods.

      Also, the user is outright lying. The USSR absolutely warned Poland not to get into loans with the IMF, and Poland ignored it anyway, proving again Poland’s political independence within the Eastern Block.