Goronmon@lemmy.world to Games@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoCourt rules Gabe Newell must appear in person to testify in Steam anti-trust lawsuitwww.pcgamer.comexternal-linkmessage-square109fedilinkarrow-up1215arrow-down17
arrow-up1208arrow-down1external-linkCourt rules Gabe Newell must appear in person to testify in Steam anti-trust lawsuitwww.pcgamer.comGoronmon@lemmy.world to Games@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square109fedilink
minus-squareExcrubulent@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up13·1 year agoI mean the simple response from the lawyer is, “Objection, relevance,” and the question gets tossed out. I demand accuracy in my jokes, even if it kills them.
minus-squareKusimulkku@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·edit-21 year ago“Objection, relevance?” “Public interest.” (Though in my joke I meant his lawyer, instead of objecting, would entreat his client to answer the question)
minus-squareExcrubulent@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 year agoAh, I understand now. [MODIFYING JOKE MATRIX TO ACCOMMODATE NEW INFORMATION] “Your honor, I need to fire my lawyer.” “Mr Newell, no competent lawyer in this country would defend you on this point. If you do not answer the question I will hold you in contempt.”
I mean the simple response from the lawyer is, “Objection, relevance,” and the question gets tossed out.
I demand accuracy in my jokes, even if it kills them.
“Objection, relevance?”
“Public interest.”
(Though in my joke I meant his lawyer, instead of objecting, would entreat his client to answer the question)
Ah, I understand now. [MODIFYING JOKE MATRIX TO ACCOMMODATE NEW INFORMATION]
“Your honor, I need to fire my lawyer.”
“Mr Newell, no competent lawyer in this country would defend you on this point. If you do not answer the question I will hold you in contempt.”
This is how we win
Lmao this is great