quo@feddit.uk to Antiwork@lemmy.ml · 1 year agoMinimum wage would be $26 an hour if it had grown in line with productivity.www.cbsnews.comexternal-linkmessage-square22fedilinkarrow-up1479arrow-down14
arrow-up1475arrow-down1external-linkMinimum wage would be $26 an hour if it had grown in line with productivity.www.cbsnews.comquo@feddit.uk to Antiwork@lemmy.ml · 1 year agomessage-square22fedilink
minus-squareNeuromancer@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agoThat’s why I said a formula. That requires each region to have a wage that people can live on. Otherwise you end with something stupid like 15 an hour which isn’t livable in California and it’s a solid living in Mississippi. The wages need to reflect the cost of living in the area to be useful. A formula allow it to be adjusted easily every year. Even at the time seven something was a lot of money but now days it’s a joke. Housing; food have all went up. I called a couple week ago to check what my old apartment rents for now. In 2001 it was 750 a month which was expensive. Now it’s close to 2k
That’s why I said a formula. That requires each region to have a wage that people can live on.
Otherwise you end with something stupid like 15 an hour which isn’t livable in California and it’s a solid living in Mississippi.
The wages need to reflect the cost of living in the area to be useful. A formula allow it to be adjusted easily every year.
Even at the time seven something was a lot of money but now days it’s a joke. Housing; food have all went up.
I called a couple week ago to check what my old apartment rents for now. In 2001 it was 750 a month which was expensive. Now it’s close to 2k