• Magnetar@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    133
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    The whole “purebred” thing always seems weird to me, “purebred” royal families aren’t pretty but full of genetic defects, why should it be an better with cats or dogs.

    • Rakonat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      61
      ·
      1 year ago

      Nearly every cat I ever had was once a stray and I wouldn’t trade that for the world.

        • credit crazy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          1 year ago

          Honestly it’s always something magical when a cat decides ah yes you are my human. It’s like the dark souls version of getting a dog. And thusly cats in a way are the peak of loyalty because no one else can win a cats favor.

        • teuast@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          I was at cat lounge/rescue/adoption place in my area recently (not to adopt, just to pet the cats) and one of the cats, a maybe ~7mo female tabby with a slightly fucked up ear named Maggie, after spending most of the time I was there hiding in a corner, decided she liked me, came up to me, sat down on my lap, and refused to budge. One of the staff members came up to say “hey man you’re at your time limit, but I can see you’re in a situation here so just… whenever is chill”

        • jballs@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          This just reminded me of a good scene in the book The House in the Cerulean Sea. Minor spoiler, the character has a cat that chooses him.

    • credit crazy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Perchance these competitions should have a points deducted by the animals quality of life. Of the poor thing has a hard time breathing -10 points idk

    • Daft_ish@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Every one acts like every purebreed is a medical oddity when really it’s just an increased likelihood of defects for certain breeds. I can tell you right now any animal can hurt your pocket the second they decide your gold plated anal beads look like a tasty treat.

    • Rolder@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      Hmm two possible reasons come to mind. First, purebred in terms of cats and dogs not necessarily meaning genetic defects. Second, having a defined breed gives the judges something to rate against.

      • SharkEatingBreakfast@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I once was looking to get a cat and found the goofiest looking idiot on Craigslist. Turns out, it was a purebred Exotic Shorthair that was surrendered to a shelter because it didn’t look fucked-up enough (it could still kind of breathe through its nose). New owners wanted to recoup costs because they adopted another cat that was “more playful” and the exotic was getting eye-goop on their white carpets. A wonderful standard for purebreeds!

        I changed his name from “Luigi” to “Waluigi”, and he was best best buddy for many many years.

      • Pringles@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not necessarily? More like by default. Purebreds are a thing because of certain genetic traits and are bred to not only maintain them, but to enhance those traits. Because of all that inbreeding the propensity for certain diseases and cancers are vastly increased. A purebred dog or cat will with near certainty be riddled with cancer or disease by the time they start getting a bit older. I love both cats and dogs, but purebreds shouldn’t be a thing.

        • oatscoop@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          It’s the size of the population and the competence/goals of the breeders. Breeders chasing exaggerated traits at the expense of the animal’s health are the major problem.

          There are “pure” breeds of every domestic animal that are healthy – provided it’s a line not perpetuated by selfish idiots. Domestic shorthair cats, various working breeds of dogs, horses, etc.

          • zalgotext@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            I like how you put “pure” in quotes because the way they keep those lines healthy is by occasionally mixing in other breeds.

            • oatscoop@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              No, it’s because I find the idea and the importance attached to it idiotic.

              Having said that, I also believe it doesn’t automatically mean a breed is inbred and/or has health problems.