That logic is flawed. Just because we don’t understand why there is something rather than nothing, there is no logical implication that there could be a higher being. “Coincidence” would seem to be a much more likely reason (until/if we understand why) - much like coincidence being the reason for most (all?) observed miracles
Elon Musk: “Hold my beer”
Also,
It is indeed. Main consequence of this is that if you join a new or small instance, you will see less of the fediverse without actively seeking it
By that logic, how do you learn to talk? Before you understand language, no one can explain the meaning of words to you.
I imagine this happens the same way. You “bootstrap” language by introducing a few touch signs and go from there.
DYI NAS (mini-itx mobo with on-board atom chip and 8 GB ram and zfs) running:
Intel NUC running:
Intel NUC (DMZ) running:
Not at all. There is a huge difference in proving a positive (i.e. that God exists) than prooving a negative (i.e. that God is IMPOSSIBLE).
EXAMPLE: Could Trump be a lizard alien in a skin suit as some might believe? Absolutely. Am I gnostic by stating in a matter of fact tone that he isn’t (and thus dependant on “faith” by extension of your argument? Probably not.
Just because someone once made a wild claim about God existing, doesn’t make me require “faith” to call out he obviously made up story with absolutely zero facts to back it as such.