Insert astounded meme when a shell partner aquires the Brand and now, (pick your)company is now a known CCP co-conspirator.

For the commercial yeah, real life is more of a no.

“I can record you too” she hath doth sayeth

No politics here, we can go about our business.

But once again, you pour over my words with such vigor. Cry into your secure little end of the void.

Not one bit. This isn’t rocket science, you wanna know something look it up son. Or else I’ll school ya. Tootles

To be honest I’m truly bored with this discussion. The argument you’ve given boils down to meaningless pedantry that critiiques ones’ presentation over facts, contained in the link I found quickly, with which to dispel the illiterate.

Buddy, you’re the one all about the safe space in your domicile with your guns. TF i care about your trolling, you’re in a thread about domestic abuse, and have no grasp on the statistics I presented to counter your high and mighty opinion.

https://gunsafety.ny.gov/domestic-violence Go to another thread with this savior attitude.

https://gunsafety.ny.gov/domestic-violence

Only discerning women carry the Clue VCR edition.

Where the bald eagle swoops in and drops a loaded gun into her hands, yah.

Let’s just set up a standoff where the husband, wife and one police officer all hold guns to each other. It’ll all sort itself out when the dust settles like the wild west. See I can come up with stupid politically motivated solutions too. Stupid, to say a gun will “fix” a situation involving domestic abuse. You hear that 2A’ers, THAT’S STUPID!

Bark on about how your rights are being taken, maybe when you find your oppressor we can throw a gun in the mix and see who comes out victorious. Waah waah, the powers are holding me down. Let’s go get the state to allow more unrestricted access to fire arms, as that’s everyone’s solution to everything.

Something something, hammer and nail

I remember early Zuckerberg comments that put me onto just how douchey corporations could be about exploiting a new resource.

Not dehumanizing them, taking away their private citizen status, because it’s right in the title “Public Official”.

See no he doesn’t if he’s a public official. The task of governing a large population requires transparency. I can’t believe that you argue in good faith that either a murdering fascist or a two bit con from New York deserves access to privacy while handling the affairs of multiple millions of people. Privacy laws do not apply to heads of state. You’re still arguing that these people should be able to avoid accountability for very real crimes.

How much privacy is expected of the POTUS? Precedent is established and in the case of the Presidency strictly adhered to until as of recently. Nah, the public was given what was owed to it.