Wait, you can refund your kid?!

Totally missed the “pick-up” part of your comment.

But the bed would have been cozy up until that point

I’d argue the coziness of a bed is also directly proportional to the environment you would have to wake up to. A bed in an oil rig would not be cozy since knowing you have to wake up to a life in an oil rig detracts from the experience.

If the recording equipment came with a subscription to a cloud storage provider that automatically uploaded everything you record on it by default and they did not report it to the authorities. Yes, we should.

I see your point. If you need to regularly haul stuff, a van is usually a better choice for the average person but I’m skeptical that construction workers, farmers and small moving companies in Europe don’t use trucks.

Ah, I see the problem. You forgot to read more than half of the post you’re replying to. Can’t say that’s on me.

I didn’t imply that. You did by leaving an overly hostile response to a comment about an article you didn’t read with objections that were addressed before you left your comment.

Nah, mate. Wanna take a guess at what actually does stand out as rather asinine and contributing nothing to the point?

So you took one sentence out of context and used it to dismiss the rest of the comment with objections that had already been addressed by the parts you dismissed?

Is there a thought to actually try to understand what is being said before uselessly getting into an argument? Or is this every lemming mission?

Sounds like you’re having a bad day. I even gave you a quote from the article that answers your exact question. Everything okay at home?

I don’t think anyone is arguing that people who need a truck shouldn’t get a truck. But regular people with trucks is every bit as stupid as driving around in a tractor.

Yes. That’s not what the regulation says, but exceptions are made all the time.

The school would still have to be the one buying the books so they just won’t buy any book they deem inappropriate. I’m sure this is mainly just to stop zealots from banning everything related to evolution. Also, I haven’t read Naked Lunch but from what I know of it, I doubt it has anything kids can’t get on the Internet nowadays.

From the article:

The bill permits restriction in the case of “developmentally inappropriate material” for certain age groups. The measure also requires local school boards and the governing bodies of public libraries to set up policies for book curation and the removal of library materials, including a way to address concerns over certain items.

I hate this community because my instinct to most posts is to downvote until I remember the OP is laughing at it, not with it. I guess that’s where the 10 downvotes come from.

3-5 small houses to rent are still 3-5 small houses people who actually need it could be living in. So, yes, your aunt is a parasite.

Them banning the bans makes me chuckle.

It’s not. It’s weird that you’re defending a billionaire, bootlicker.

It doesn’t vibe with animal farm, though