Removed by mod

Almost a troll-like insistence on lack of nuance to an extremely complex situation

Removed by mod

I believe black people’s lives matter. I hold that view so strongly that I’m willing to shout it in the streets. Does that make part of a political extremist movement?

That’s quite the false equivalence you’ve made there

I’ll take both please

Pretty sure Whole Foods had shitty conservative executives back then too didn’t they?

Is this in a museum somewhere? Would be cool to see up close

I’d subscribe to a whole community about upcoming actions/protests/marches

Because they don’t care about quality in depth content. They’re just in it for the clicks. Probably had an algorithm fill in the remaining paragraphs

Would this look any different if it displayed average salary instead of iPhone price as a percentage of average salary?

This seemed like a big win until I saw the graph. Holy shit either reporting changed alot, or there’s a long way to go before things are even remotely okay.

SOLVED

Thank you. As someone who knows nothing about that religion this headline was extremely confusing to me

We could theoretically subsidize our way through the cost difference until it becomes cheap enough to sustain through market mechanisms

We know

Here’s todays winner for most unintelligible title

Right? Name one thing, anywhere in humanity, that somebody isn’t profiting from

Even accounting for how car-centric US cities are, I agree with that commenter. Yeah it may be hard to get downtown from outlying neighborhoods without a car, but sidewalks have ramps and building have access. Hell, the parking lots have designated parking spaces. Not true at all in most European cities

Edit: I guess it’s worth a little more nuance than just limping all European cities in the same category. The wealthier northern cities have definitely caught up a bit (though they all still have buildings that are completely inaccessible). The real problems are the southern cities like Rome, Madrid, Athens, Lisbon etc.

That’s approximately the total number of people who will die in the next 100 years from anything. There’s only about 60 million deaths per year now, which will climb to like 120 million by the end of the century due to shifting demographics. These authors are basically just saying “a majority of deaths will have some climate related basis”.