Why’s there so much politics in our politics these days?

Your honor, I said it was “random” but never specified the probably distribution

Super Trooper Halloween costume

Yeah but why wouldn’t they want to spend a bunch of money to make their solar panels 1% less effective for the benefit of the US imperial order? Just makes sense really.

All the guns and blue lives gear is them trying to hype themselves up to go to war. But they don’t realize that buying luxury goods and identifying with a brand is not really relevant to winning a civil war.

I don’t think they have any revolutionary potential. There are a large number of far-right people willing to do violence, but how many of them are willing to risk losing their lives or their businesses or their treats? They’re only willing to drive their trucks through crowds because they know there’s a good chance they’ll get away with it. They’re also incapable of organizing with their peers, they’ll only attend a meeting if they get to threaten the school board or whatever. They view discipline as an unjust imposition on their freedom.

They can do terrorism but can’t engage in sustained conflict, they’re basically like Israel settles but less capable and less unified.

But ultimately the US is declining into some kind of neo-fascism anyway. It doesn’t rely on their revolutionary potential, it’s just the logic of our ruling institutions.

Interesting offer, but if I vote Trump someone just offered me 3 votes in useless states and one of those books of Arby’s coupons. Any couner-offers?

Also: “Harris said she’ll try to negotiate an end to the violence. That oughta be enough.”

JFC this guy is supposedly a huge genius of campaigning? Maybe the Clintons really are trying to sabotage Harris

And when you find that 1% that originated with communists or abolitionists or something, it’s even more shocking

And the guided munitions

a

When people occasionally argue that peasants didn’t understand literal vs metaphorical, I’ve always found that hard to believe, but maybe Peterson is actually like that.

Disappointing the owner would do that, but this still builds the narrative so it’s still a win regardless of what he says now.

And all direct to standard, so you can’t escape in any format

Year of 4 presidents still a possibility

First thought: literally who?

Brief search: oh, an idle rich kid turned D-tier author and opinion-haver.

Shocked that a nominal socdem “in the top 10 percent of the 1 percent wealthiest in the country” would “leave” the “left.”

Sure war crimes are bad, but that doesn’t mean you can break the rules to not do them.

Due to austerity we now only have 1.5 of them, and that number will continue to decline in future FYs

At least podcasts are relatively decentralized, or at least more easily moved

To a small degree maybe, but I imagine if you’re not enthusiastic about killing children you get shuffled off to some other role reasonably quickly. As an institution they’re motivated to match the real bloodthirsty psychos with the hands-on jobs, and give the genocide-support roles to the squeamish ones.