Dylpickles

I learned to play guitar which was fun I guess

Yeah again it’s super inconsistent in how it’s described. Also given how long the slash is going from neck to chest I dunno just can’t imagine how she managed that. There’s the defensive cuts and the one near her neck just BARELY missed her carotid artery.

Also something that’s never mentioned is that her youngest child who was I believe 7 months lived and was asleep upstairs with her husband. How did he not wake up? Why would she kill her two kids and leave the other one?

I dunno I kinda wonder if it wasn’t some kind of domestic abuse situation gone particularly bad where she was coerced into going with the intruder story.

Idk I just can’t say that there’s anywhere near enough evidence to prove beyond a reasonable doubt she did it.

But he had 25 years of blood splatter analysis experience!! /s

How does one even quantify that like did you go to blood splatter university? Get your masters in blood splatterology? Sounds like someone pumping up their resume to make the prosecution’s case seem more realistic. Looking at you Tom Bevel (the supposed blood splatter expert on her case).

This. This is what it really comes down to. Idk how this resulted in her on death row it’s way too shaky imo

Idk I’m just really hesitant to even believe the “statement of facts” because so much of this seems like she was presumed guilty from the start. I mean go back and read the original statement of facts from any death row murder case that ended up overturned to give you a good example. Kirk bloodsworth Like those are almost always written in such a way that supports the outcome of the case in my experience.

Ralph Wright is another one that comes to mind where there’s a statement of facts out there that sounds incredibly damning but resulted in his exoneration after DNA testing.

After more reading it still seems like a lot of this is based on blood splatter stuff which is still super weird. It really sounds, the more I read the statement of facts, they took someone who was pretty fucked after what happened and who was already a little crazy and then cross examined the fuck out of her till she was like “I don’t remember what happened!”

Which like shit I get that way when my girlfriend questions something I said too much. I have 0 confidence in my own memory.

I mean I agree with the defense like if you’re willing to kill why not kill the husband for his life insurance why not idk rob someone. Killing your kids is such a shenanigans way to go about this if the motive is financial struggles.

The big thing that makes me question things is one of the knives in the block having fibers that are supposedly consistent with the intruder’s entry point on it. A lot of people take that as she cut it from the inside and put the knife back. I mean that sounds compelling and all but like that’s really the only thing here that feels like actually evidence that it may have been a staged crime scene.

Other than that it just seems a lot like they’re speculating on blood stain patterns, remarking on a lack of evidence that there was an intruder when a lot of the evidence they expect from an intruder aren’t the type of thing that HAS to be there, and they keep referencing these statements on the wound she had that are in my opinion really inconsistent. Like why’d they do the exploratory surgery? Idk the whole thing doesn’t make a lot of sense to me.

Jeeeesus Christ talk about a weird case with no evidence leading someone to death row.

That whole trial seems insane like there’s literally no evidence she did any of this shit. All they had was like some blood splatters they speculated MIGHT be caused by her raising the knife over her head to stab the kids.

Seriously what the fuck.

Edit: holy fuck have y’all read the signed affidavit from her husband explaining how he had seemingly hired someone to steal his car and rob his house for insurance claims???

I think you’re a little silly for assuming that directly references Prince. I wasn’t even alive when all that stuff with Prince was happening and I had only heard it happened in a conversation I had with my mom when I was like 12. A conversation suddenly brought back to mind by your comment.

That’s just kinda what you call something that was formerly known as something else when the something else is not well received.

Yooo I’ve also been replaying it. I’ve 100% it already but with the next gen updates there were a good chunk of changes. I’ve been loving it all over again.

So she sounds sketchy I GUESS but I can’t help but look at everything the police have said thus far and think “that’s kinda fuckin dumb isn’t it?”

Like no evidence of the baby? The baby walked for 6 football fields? The fuck are you talking about dude?? She was in a car. You obviously got this information from cell towers. Just because she can continue to relay visual information about the child for 600 yards doesn’t mean the baby also traveled 600 yards.

Unless the phone call was her being like “oh yeah that baby is walking quite a bit looks like I dunno he’s coming up on clearing 4 football fields about now”

Ridiculous. Also I dunno dude like this whole thing is definitely bizarre but really not that bizarre?

Like she was probably stealing from work which good more power to her. The amber alert thing from her and her friend at work is probably her looking it up snapchatting a friend about it and then the friend looking it up.

Which tbh it seems like such a dead lead I mean amber alerts are used to find kids who are currently missing not to find the parents of those kids. Idk why it’s so hard to believe that a regular person would just not know what tf they were used for and be confused about how to proceed in this situation.

Furthermore, I can’t really think of a situation where someone would willingly leave their car, phone, and I believe keys all on the side of the road and it be for some supposed ruse.

Everything the police have release on this case thus far seems really fuckin lazy imo and is them stacking up the “reasons” why they won’t pursue the case any further.

Edit: oh and I forgot to mention them continually referencing that she looked up the movie taken?? Like who the fuck cares dude what could that possibly have to do with anything?? Was she looking for inspiration on how to scream into a phone that’s been dropped on the floor? I swear they’re grasping at straws to make it seem sketchier than it is and justify them doing a shitty job on the investigation.

Edit 2: they got the information about her moving 600 yards from an app on her phone

Edit 3: amber alert search seemingly came two days prior with one claim of a search coming from her workplace on the day of her disappearance. I think that’s sketchy and all but I’ve also only seen that information in one place. I think at this point all we can do is stay tuned. I just really can’t imagine what benefit this would be to anyone to fake

Edit 4: I still think police are mad incompetent, I still think the “issue” of the toddler moving 600 yards is stupid, and frankly I think expecting there to be other calls about a child is also kinda stupid given the videos and her detailing in the call that he’s hard to see. All of that being said I think I’m holding out for more details. To my mind she’s innocent till proven guilty and cops are incompetent until proven capable. I’ll edit again if anything interesting comes up

This, I need more of this