1·
19 days agoIn a garden…growth has its seasons…first there‘s spring…
- 8 Posts
- 313 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
Cake day: April 3rd, 2024
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
never heard of it, thanks for the tip!
2·22 days agoIf the discourse goes like this, if we choose to communicate at that level, anthropomorphize nation states like this as if it meant nothing we don’t deserve better.
Let’s get fucking educated again
It’s not true. Military spending during the Cold War in Europe was substantial. It changed after 1990.
Russia is landing blow after blow? Which ones do you have in mind?
111·1 month agomaybe wanna brush up on history.
People didn‘t stay on their farms because there were big land reforms in the late 18th and early 19th century. In places serfdom was abolished, in England common land was privatised. The were loads of people who suddenly had no means of surviving and capitalists suddenly had a lot of desperate workers ready to be exploited.
Russian, American, who knows
10·1 month agoVery cool.
The chunkiest Jack Russell Terrier I’ve ever seen
if he wanted to slander him because the soldier is a soldier, isn‘t that very, very close to Soldaten sind Mörder?
When you say obviously the recruitment drive was challenged, who are you thinking of? Clearly not the school?
And what do you think?
Did Bentik want to slander this individual soldier or the institution and their unchallenged recruitment drive at schools?
If it was true… It is it’s even worse that the court went with personal defamation when:
“In der Klageakte wird die Bundeswehr ausdrücklich als geschädigte Institution aufgeführt. In der Anklageschrift steht, dass der Jugendoffizier „in seinem Namen und im Namen seines Arbeitgebers“ klagt.
Mentioning this in this forum is getting me labeled an orc. It’s confirming what I am trying to say.
And I’ll say this, just to make clear that we once were able to criticise this institution:
Soldaten sind Mörder.
Unfortunately Germany also doesn’t seem to be able to handle criticism of militarism:
Also the EU is sanctioning narratives of this war it doesn’t agree with.
So I believe his statement to be true, because you came up with that shoddy dismissal.
You don’t see any behavioural similarities between drug use and social media usage?
Your critique isn’t addressing that, you state instead that media is social. Well yeah. Drug consumption is in many cases too. But that doesn’t define it.
You also make it seem as if there was just a single dangerous outlier in the game that can’t be used as a reference.
How about the studies of the algorithms of Meta, youtube, reddit, that revealed how they work on the dopamine centres of their users and manipulate them?
fair, I shouldn’t have used that tone. Sorry for that.
Now let’s please explain how that thought entered you mind and you then thought it plausible enough to state it publicly?
Some seek salvation in the deportation of brown people, others in the reindustrialisation of Europe and renewed nationalism labeled as sovereignty and independence.
Both are just results of a deep seated nostalgia of times that were shit, too.
We had decades of ever increasing productivity and what did we gain?
Well, maybe less than the Chinese? So yeah let’s get our ideological hammers and bash in the Chinese, cause there’s obviously nothing else we can do.
Lack of imagination is like a disease. Chinese Mercantilism, jeez, who comes up with stuff like that.
I’d like to see this more often. We can’t only hold Trump accountable. We have to talk about the US rather than one mad man. If he wouldn’t act in her interest, they surely would reign him in. As long as not, the American elite is complicit and responsible.