To be, like, super and needlessly pedantic, lol, Linus looks like her since she’s older.

No, she’s much wittier than I am. Though I did try to write it in her style.

I have room in the panel now, that’s not the problem. Was just thinking it would be more economical to run one big circuit from the basement up to the kitchen and do the breakout there versus running 4-6 new individual circuits all that way.

Upgrading to a 200A panel is on the horizon though not right at this moment.

Unfortunately, time and money are factors. Not that I want to cheap out, I just thought maybe a sub panel might be more economical.

They wouldn’t know to check the kitchen has its own sub panel.

I mean, when there’s only a 40 amp breaker labeled “Kitchen S/P” I think they’d figure it out.

The kitchen would be the only room with a subpanel.

As stated in the post, the oven is already on a dedicated 30A circuit, and I’m not going to mess with that. There’s an empty void near the oven, though, and my thought was to run another 30 amp circuit up beside that to feed the subpanel and place it in that “void”. Decorating isn’t a concern for the void as there’s not much that can really go there anyway.

Definitely want to future proof it, yeah. I’m not married to 30 amp delivery to it, just used that as a reference point.

NEC requires 2 different 20 amp circuits for counter top use, 15 amps is not allowed,

That I didn’t know (or rather, haven’t read yet). Current ones are on 15 amp circuits, so I was going by that (not that previous owners seemed too concerned with “code” LOL).

Stove’s already on a dedicated breaker.

This is the US and we only have split-phase (two ‘hot’ legs at 120v on each end of a center-tap transformer)

Very nice!

Unfortunately, there’s many many reasons that could be the case. I’m just putting this out there since it’s easy to check for and mitigate against.

No, that’s just /api/v3/user which returns both posts and comments.

Good idea with the f2b integration.

I thought about that before just blocking unscoped requests to that endpoint in Nginx.

That was my thought, but also wasn’t sure since there might be a use-case I’m unfamiliar with. I vaguely recall seeing a feature request for Photon a while back to be able to just browse comments, so I assume that would be how it worked.

But yeah as it is now, it can be abused.

That’s my normal go-to, but more than once I’ve accidentally blocked locations that Let’s Encrypt uses for secondary validation, so I’ve had to be more precise with my firewall blocks

Lemmy. I added a comment above since LW wouldn’t let me edit the post.

Mine’s only extended with some WAF rules and I’ve got a massive laundry list of bot user agents that it blocks, but otherwise it’s pretty bog standard.

If instances have Anubis setup correctly (i.e. not in front of /api/...) then that might not help them since this is calling the API endpoint.

Can’t edit the post (Thanks Cloudflare! /s) but additional info:

• I truncated the log excerpts in the post. The user agent string in these requests isn’t shown here, but it is blank in the actual logs.
• This is for Lemmy admins only. It might apply to others in some form, but this seems to be specifically exploiting a Lemmy API endpoint
• My Nginx solution may have room for improvement; I was just trying to block that behavior without breaking comments in posts and move on with my day. Suggestions for improvement are welcome.

Seems more like a genuine feature to me.

I don’t know how many requests I’ve seen for Lemmy apps to be able to swipe between posts in the feed.

Seems that’s basically what they’re doing here.

But also, gesture navigation is terrible, I hate it, and always turn on 3-button navigation when I get a new phone anyway.

I shouldn’t say this, but whatever: It’s a “troll” tactic to do that since mods/admins can’t ban with content removal if the account is deleted (unless that’s fixed in .13?) . Admins can remove the deleted flag in the DB for the user and then do so, but mods can only remove items individually. Not that any of these necessarily warrant removal on their own, but not doing so in this case encourages this kind of “hit it and quit it” behavior, and this user is clearly ban evading.

I’m not saying this as an instruction manual but merely as a statement of fact about how stupid Lemmy’s behavior is with regard to deleted accounts.

They’ve had many, many alts over the last 6+ months with the same posting pattern. Not one has been marked as a bot.

Ok, I just gotta ask: what is your motive here?

You get banned every other day for spamming out a massive number of posts. And you just make a new account the next day, start the exact same thing again like…you’ve learned nothing?

I’m tired of my feed being an entire page of just you, and I’m tired of blocking you. Can you not just post things at a normal rate?

but I send you a PM

Oh, sorry. One of the new features in this dev branch is the ability to disable PMs and mentions. I’ve been running with those turned off. Seems like that feature is working lol.

I turned DMs back on and found the message - will try to join here when I’m back on desktop. Dunno how active I can be right now, but I am eventually going to start on Piefed so would be nice to have a sounding board.

Some of the devs are already working on shared logic/libraries between apps.

Nice!

Oh, I meant just if the instance isn’t know, I thought resolving would make it “aware” of that instance. I could be wrong. But yeah, the instance would have to federate with the other one for it to be able to resolve, though. e.g. it won’t resolve an object from an instance that is on the current instance’s “block” list.