SolidaritySplodarity [they/them]

The Soviets killed a bunch of Nazi soldiers after they were captured (fucking good) and put a lot more into their gulag system for 4-10 years where they either died or ended up reeducated. Nazi soldiers were not treated well, though said Nazis were trying to genocide all kinds of groups, including settler-colonizing Russia, and burned, raped, and pillaged their way to Stalingrad, so I’m not going to cry over them under any circumstances.

Force-feeding means they use a weird speculum-like thing to feed them extra food.

In the scheme of animal ag, that is pretty tame. Most animals are kept in tight quarters, are prone to disease, will be killed when they get a disease that would “cost too much”, live in their own faeces… and are then killed so that someone can experience a very specific kind of pleasure when eating them.

Anima welfare discourse like this is sometimes well-meaning but tends to ignore the elephant in the room: what happens to the other animals you eat?

My understanding is that interpretations that it’s about LGBTQ+ people are Western projections onto what discriminating against K-pop beauty standards means in China. The trend getting targeted is about cishet-presenting male entertainers adopting a particular style in order to appeal to a female audience.

“Did you kill anyone?” is a great way to piss off a reactionary veteran and I highly recommend it.

What does he normally eat?

This is one of those things that seems like an unwinnable battle under present conditions. We’d need massive campaigns to survey for thes plants and then kill only them. I’ve only seen efforts be successful when confined to one mountain.

This seems like a project for a socialist state. A centrally-planned effort targeted at da youths to eliminate a plant species from a continent.

Because they didn’t read Marx for basic comprehension. That is always the answer. Instead, the critics seem to just copy and cite each others’ misapprehensions.

The most common criticism is to declare a dichotomy between LTV and marginalism, which to me implies that they don’t really understand either of them because they’re confusing pricing with the Marxist concept of the aggregate value of commodities. Anyone who read Capital while conscious will know how ridiculous this is, given that Marx explicitly differentiated this from exchange value.