It could have some tangential uses, done responsibly. “Hey Claude, check the source material for all of these citations and find any that disagree with the way they’re being used in the Wikipedia article.”
And then, critically, you have a human review that output.
AI is going to be useful in a number of areas.
This isn’t one of them.
The best use of AI is when it can look up existing text that you know already exists and apply it to your circumstances.
Wikipedia is the opposite of that. It is the existing text. AI Wikipedia would be the exact ouroburos of bullshitifying the Internet that experts have been warning about.
Because they want to get every single nickel and dime they can out of each and every one of us.
the ads went away when the internet access did.
Then why are you mad?
Also, she’s an actress. What she/they want to show on TV might be a slightly different standard.
It can be both.
I would rather live in a big house in a more walking and mass transit based community.
Is it possible. We even have the stores in walking distance… If they were made to be walkable.
We’re starting, on a very small scale. New, trendy communities are usually 5 over 1s, and they’re learning to put the parking in the back, with small walkable streets in the front.
The mass transit part is key though, and that’s very, very lacking.
8GB ram though.
This one? 
I hadn’t heard about the hole, but I’ll ask Ukraine.
They do some of this too with the timing. It’s always “you have five minutes left” when they clearly had more time than that.
It’s just ordering in editing though.
He had enough evidence to state the conclusion clearly.
It’s obvious he wanted Congress to do that part, but he still needed to say it.
Even so, he did fight the good fight, and I’m not going to hate a man for a slight miscalculation of strategy that only became obvious with hindsight.
Also he’s here completely legally.
Believe it or not there was a time before Trump.
You know I replaced that with a static image years ago, right?
Arguable
Oh, I was talking about GitHub copilot that’s in visual studio.
I’m usually just very targeted in what I ask it to do. I keep it to things I know will be in the basic reference books or on stack overflow. It basically just saves me from having to look up and apply existing examples to my code.
It makes for a pretty good ORM.
Generally it’s hidden, but there are a number of caveats as JRaccoon says.
It’d be good to know which instances proxy images and which don’t. It’d also be nice if some of this was controlled by your client if using an app.
It’s also fairly easy to end up on another instance. And any articles you click on will take you to a domain that collects your IP.
Copilot isn’t bad, but generally I agree.
It’s a tool that can be helpful, or you can just create problems for yourself down the road.
It’s a lot like building a house. After all the drywall is up, it’s hard to tell if the studs are 18 inches apart or five feet apart, but you’re gonna find out eventually.
It’s the dotcom boom and bust.
The hype among corpos that AI is going to replace all labor is stupid. But when the bust happens and the hype dies down, we’re still gonna be ordering pizzas online, Amazon will exist, and it’ll be a thing we work with forever.