Another hot tip: don’t refer to people as “normies.”

Nostalgia is really interesting in that it’s inherently bittersweet. It’s nice because it grounds us in a shared timeline and focuses on mostly positive aspects of some past point in time, but it’s also sad because it means thinking back fondly on a time that will never be again.

So maybe it’s the bitter half of that bittersweet feeling that you’re subconsciously averse to? Either that or maybe your past/childhood was mostly negative or even traumatic? I’m no psychologist, so really I don’t know what I’m talking about.

This is exactly what I was going to say. The feed on Threads is absolutely abysmal. Just an endless stream of bullshit that I don’t want to see. That might improve in the future as they continue to update the app and its feed algorithms, but as of right now it’s pretty terrible at showing the user content that they’re interested in.

This was my first reaction to the article as well. The only one around me suddenly vanished a few months ago.

I’ll be keeping an eye on this thread because I would also love to know if I’m missing out on some good games journalism out there. Sadly, sites like what you’ve described are increasingly rare in the modern era. Nevertheless, here are a few that come to mind:

NintendoLife is pretty great for this if you’re looking for Nintendo-related news, reviews, interviews, and feature articles.

One of their affiliate sites, Time Extension, is also really good for long-form articles and retrospectives about retro games.

And while it’s mostly just news, like you said, Polygon will sometimes surprise you with some really excellent feature articles that have a lot of thought and research put into them.

Yeah, that surprised me, actually.

I just took Mastodon for a spin only a week or so ago, and it felt much less active than most of the communities on here do. Just my anecdotal experience, though. I couldn’t find more than a handful of Twitter-migrated accounts on Mastodon that I cared to follow. There just wasn’t much happening on there that I’m interested in when I last checked. I’ll look again.

Because it’s just an incredibly small userbase made up mostly of tech/privacy enthusiasts as of right now.

Haha, yeah. I think that’s the intent of those first two panels.

But then the last two subvert expectations and reveal that it was about data modeling all along! 😲

I just mean I can relate to the comic.

In my line of work it’s not uncommon for the people requesting data visualizations to ask the data engineers/analysts to simply remove data points that don’t suit whatever narrative they’re trying to construct with the visual. We have to push back against that whenever possible because, you know… that’s bullshit.

Not yet, no.

Is this an assumption or can someone else confirm this? I just started using Connect, so I’d love to know for sure.

Data Architect/Analyst here. I felt this comic.