RiotDoll [she/her, she/her]

Woo Fool

  • 12 Posts
  • 202 Comments
Joined 6 months ago
cake
Cake day: May 28th, 2024

help-circle
  • I’d have to look at the book and see more to say more, but actual astrology thinks of a sun sign as a single piece of a bigger interlocking system. If it’s genuinely for astrologers, it’s going to be a systematic breakdown and be much more involved than what that backside is saying, which imo is to get people to buy the book who understand astrology from sun sign columns going “yeah what kind of a kinky weirdo am I, as a cancer…? oh…” and maybe buying it, but the actual audience would be someone very different from that i guess idk esotericism is weird because with things like astrology, the marketing is at odds with the actual content you know?


  • I’m learning to hate people more but in general the thing that earnestly held me back was just using empathy - even if i am objectively in the right I can still see how people get to a decision or behavior usually, and it always regulated me to remind myself i’m just another dipshit with stuff going on that someone is gonna see and absolutely fucking hate, and thereby hate me.

    I just try to give the benefit of the doubt that I’d want. I don’t have people’s story. I don’t know how they got to whatever they’re doing, or why.

    But also this never covered all use cases and sometimes it’s just better to hate. I dunno man it feels like it degrades me to lean into it though, i kinda hate hate






  • where people like AOC are a sheepdog, guys like this are literally wolves in sheeps clothing. This is the rhetoric of a reactionary signalling who is to be blamed to the public, to the donors and the party elite - they know why they lost, they’re fine with it - the money says fascism is the way forward, and the money gets what the money wants. Everyone at that level gets a payday so it doesn’t matter.

    Don’t take it as an absolute fool saying the wrong and busted thing, take it as a signal that yes, the drive to the right will continue unabated. Cheney endorsements will seem quaint in 2028.






  • opponents of israel are treated like enemies of the state

    i’d say it’s weird but it’s not at all, it’s been a thing that has been slowly ramping up for a very long time

    the feds are getting really good at boiling the frog.

    These psychopaths turn everything into metrics. The pro-palestinian calls are probably marked, they’re probably associated with the name on the voter registry, and that probably goes somewhere nasty.

    This is kinda paranoid but in general people should probably not offer their genuine opinions to officials of a major political party or any operative of the state or federal government, even if it gives you some wicked sick catharsis, because these losers absolutely keep score and I am pretty sure we’re going into a phase of governance in this country where having plausible deniability for your ‘disloyalty’ is a good thing - and for whatever reason, support to israel is seen as a critical indicator.











  • Hey, I’m a religion nerd?

    But religion nerds who know way more than me and can make a better case for what atheism really is under the hood have made videos i can share.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AfcwTiOGnig

    This guy is pretty good in general, if you want to understand religion on a deeper level than like, what’s common to everyone. Because common knowlege about religion is garbage. Like huge garbage. It’s all shit. I can’t have normal conversations about these topics anymore, because i know more than most people and not enough for everyone i learn from. It’s great.

    edit: also i should probably define terms. I’m aware atheism can mean non-religious, but given that in name it’s defined in terms of negating religion, people who study religion are still probably the best lens we have to study it as a phenomenon, but i don’t want to imply any kind of personal belief about what atheism is - what it is is complicated and it does range from a redditor who is a little too into dawkins, to atheistic forms of religious behavior that don’t fit neatly into categories of belief or non belief - it’s a weirdly huge topic.