Ok, I understand what you meant, thanks.
Basically, after I’ve read all of that, it’s clear as day that security is not a priority on Testing. And while band-aid solutions do exist, it’s simply not designed to be secure.
Yeah, I wouldn’t run it in a production environment.
Sure, but even in those “few cases” Testing will get them soon.
I did read at some point that Testing may receive security updates later than stable, might be in those cases in which backports come straight from unstable.
I don’t recommend going for (Debian’s/Devuan’s) testing (branch) as it targets a peculiar niche that I fail to understand; e.g. it doesn’t receive the security backports like Stable does nor does it receive them as soon as Unstable/Sid does. Unstable/Sid could work, but I would definitely setup (GRUB-)Btrfs + Timeshift/Snapper to retain my sanity.
From https://backports.debian.org/ :
Backports are packages taken from the next Debian release (called “testing”), adjusted and recompiled for usage on Debian stable
So by definition, security backports in stable are present in Testing in the form of regular packages, right?
I remember having some issue like that, but I’m not sure if this was the fix.
Try unchecking “Show desktop notifications when the song changes” on Spotify’s settings (right now it’s under the Display section).
Makes sense, thanks.
New to Linux: in which case would you stick with an “old-old-stable” release?
Software incompatibility?
At first glance the difference in width comes from the front wings, which protruded beyond the wheels in the '22 cars.
So hopefully the wings last longer in wheel to wheel action.
restricting the total amount used and basically anything else makes more sense
Oh you meant eliminate the flow limit, I thought you meant eliminate the fuel itself. And I agree (with the caveat you said, also limiting the total amount).
That won’t happen for 15 years at least, only Formula E can be fully electric.
With an FIA exclusivity deal through 2039 to be the sole EV single-seat series on the FIA menu, Formula E has plenty of time to grow.
The band played 2 early albums + their latest one in sequence. Listening to whole albums in one go was great for many reasons.
May be a coincidence, but it stopped launching for me too. Worked Monday and Tuesday, yesterday I didn’t try to play, today it didn’t work.
Tried:
I’m running a 6700XT and weirdly enough it pre-compiled in Linux but not in Windows.
It’s really stuttery for a while in Windows, with low GPU usage and erratic frequency, until it normalizes.
I’m getting none of that in Linux, smooth from the start in-game. Only getting some weird fps fluctuation in the start menu.
Makes sense, thank you for the clarification.
It is also a file browser.
And apparently also supports FTP/SFTP, quite nifty.
I’m new-ish to Linux and new to Debian, but I literally just did a (second) Debian 12 install, so I have one note about your Firefox’s documentation, specifically about “chromium’s suggestion” when uninstalling Firefox. https://makedebianfunagainandlearnhowtodoothercoolstufftoo.computer/doku.php?id=start:firefoxesr
Besides Firefox ESR, it came bundled with “Konqueror”. Don’t know if it depends on your installation’s configuration, though. I selected to install “non-free” software, if it helps. So for me it didn’t complain when I uninstalled Firefox ESR, it just set Konqueror as the default web browser
From the F1 channel, here it is in action (shakedown test).
I don’t know if we’re discussing semantics. A performance score is attributed, and before the fix their scores were all 166. It doesn’t work, as you said. So the consequence is the preferred core being “random”, isn’t it?
Apparently there’s a bug in an AMD’s driver. It was supposed to assign processes based on each core’s self reported performance, but because of the bug it was random.
This “self reported performance” is based on evaluation done to the cores in the fab process, by AMD. Meaning, due to imperfections some cores are a bit better than others.
This one in South Korea is pretty recent (October 2022).