The struggle is not so apparent in the beating heart of 21st century imperialist hegemony, but if you look you will find it. In many real ways, the world proletarian revolution continues everywhere, even in the minds of the oppressed. The goal however is to widen the frontier of revolution everywhere

That is true, my bad. My point still stands in the case of the Dem party leadership, who pretended to parrot the same rhetoric cynically whereas the Lincoln Project circlejerkers et al believed it actually

“Here’s my revolutionary new strategy: what we just tried to do!”

Nobody allowed near money is truly incompetent. The function of all of this rhetoric, so called “strategy” etc was to win with a pro-capital mandate or lose to fundraise again. Lenin asks us to consider who stands to gain when it comes to bourgeois politics

Don’t spend another minute arguing with family, friends, coworkers or Internet strangers. Go read the classic Marxist canon, read the history of socialist movements, and join an organization

Good luck, kick ass

Most have correctly realized that bourgeois democracy is a sham for working people

Fashy poo poo

Anyone offering you anything that’s not written down can take it away at any time. It could be a legit offer, but if you rely on it, it puts you in a position of vulnerability. My advice is say sure, and have a back up plan. Trust your gut in all things. Good luck!

Smash barm, Wigan kebab with pae wet, babby’s yed and chips

This is quite literally sheepdogging

Good riddance to bad rubbish

Phonebanking for the Bolsheviks as we speak

Yeah need to know this ASAP

Not sure if we have any Irish comrades here but you guys eat the least spicy food I’ve ever had. All the Asian and Indian food was wayyyy toned down. It’s all love though for real tiochfadh ar la

The what now?

A very convenient way to cook tofu before adding it back in to a stir fry, curry, sandwich, or anything. I pretty much exclusively cook my tofu in an air fryer

Great job David!

How can we be sure anyone did anything or was anywhere? Even in cases where there were eye witnesses or DNA evidence, none of that is conclusive in the pure sense, it’s just a testimony and occurrence. There’s always a possibility that everyone is lying, the video evidence has been tampered with, the fingerprints were planted or perhaps the lab mistakenly identified them as so-and-sos when they were really someone else’s. All we can do is determine based on the available knowledge and wisdom of the day how likely it was that a crime was committed based on the evidence.

With the case of OJ, there was a pattern of abusive behavior in his relationship with his ex wife, DNA evidence at the crime scene, and the murder itself based on the condition of the bodies of the deceased and the state of the crime scene suggested that the assailant committed an intensely violent act on Nicole and her friend, not characteristic of a botched robbery etc. Along with OJs testimony and his suspiciously timed travel arrangements, and in the absence of another theoretical perpetrator, there is a pretty compelling case against him.