Wrong again, sparky.
Wrong again, sparky.
Your performative concern for animals is noted.
Cats are obligate carnivores, sparky. That means they can’t be vegan.
Craftsman was the first brand that came to mind.
You may be thinking of TNG’s second season, which ended with the abysmal “Shades of Grey”. The third season ended with “The Best of Both Worlds, Part 1”
Don’t forget the horrors it’ll produce from absorbing the Dwarf Fortress subreddits.
No, sweetie, you really don’t understand the primary process, or how presidential elections work in this country.
Had his party prevent a primary process? Do you have even the slightest idea of how presidential elections work? The incumbent president enjoys the presumption of being the nominee as long as they can, and want to, run again. If you didn’t understand that the first time around, that’s your fault.
No, it’s making fun of that assumption.
It would cost far more to not address the issue.
He doesn’t actually mean everyone. He’d have no problem with his mistress getting breast implants.
Except they literally don’t. Human memory doesn’t retain an exact copy of things. Very good isn’t the same as exactly. And human beings can’t grab everything they see and instantly use it.
Previous wrongs don’t make this instance right.
The problem is that a human doesn’t absorb exact copies of what it learns from, and fair use doesn’t include taking entire works, shoving them in a box, and shaking it until something you want comes out.
The difference here is that a child can’t absorb and suddenly use massive amounts of data.
How hard it is doesn’t matter. If you can’t compensate people for using their work, or excluding work people don’t want users, you just don’t get that data.
There’s plenty of stuff in the public domain.
It’s not using a computer that’s the problem. The issue is that generative AI scrapes the entire internet to feed its model without compensating, or even asking, creators for using their work.
The part where it gives random results of varying quality, sparky.