Random guy on the internet: lack of work life balance is for pathetic losers who have nobody who loves them. Don’t be like loser billionaires, be like random internet chad.

Says the person whose only contribution to the thread is insulting others. Fuck off.

In no sense of the word would anyone ever say he created Alice. It could be called an interpretation, not quite an adaptation, but probably just based on characters by Lewis Carroll.

Lmao 😂

Literally didn’t say that. Thanks for that useless input.

In the English speaking world, not really, no. People with little firearms experience incorrectly refer to cartridges as bullets, but they are exactly that: incorrect.

I know I get that, its just that Alice is both the name of the game and the name of the character, one of which he created and the other he didn’t. There’s not a great way to phrase it, but it makes it sound like he created the character Alice, which he did not.

Calling American McGee “Alice creator” with no additional context is a bit absurd.

My point is if something is impossible to do, that doesn’t make it difficult. It makes it impossible. Those are two different things.

Literally not at all what I said. Put that shit back in your ass where it belongs.

Slop ≠ sloppy, and the opposite of slop is not precise.

The fuck does that sentence even mean?

Not necessarily. Just because someone at one time didn’t think it had value, that doesn’t mean nobody ever would think it didn’t have value.

Why would you not just use a normal fucking voice recorder? Or the fucking phone you have in your pocket? Why this creepy-ass pasta-sauce branded device?

That law was added when guns were so imprecise it was difficult to hit the broadside of a barn from inside the barn.

How is that not blatantly false? Piss off troll.

And millions of people enjoy trash mobile games that throw microtransactions at you every couple of minutes. Popularity is not an indicator of quality.

They weren’t idiots either. They weren’t stupid enough to think technology was static and would never improve, firearms technology was literally improving during their lifetime. They wrote the constitution the way they did deliberately. The constitution was meant to be a living document, true, but the only reason to change that amendment is, simply put, fascism.

I do know what I’m talking about. Your link is incorrect. What you’re showing me a photo of is an ammo cartridge. A cartridge contains a bullet, a casing, gunpowder, and a primer. The part labelled projectile is the bullet. Not all projectiles are bullets, but all bullets are projectiles. The (typically brass) casing houses the gunpowder and the bullet is seated in the opening of the casing, with the primer at the closed end. All these components together is called a cartridge. You can buy bullets on their own, sure, but if you just buy a box of bullets all you are getting is the projectile. If you buy a box of ammo, you are buying a box of cartridges.

That law was added when guns were so imprecise it was difficult to hit the broadside of a barn from inside the barn.

That’s blatantly false. Timothy Murphy killed a British officer during the Revolutionary War at a distance of 300-400 yards. They absolutely had the capability of precise marksmanship at the time the constitution was written. Repeating rifles were not a foreign concept either. They weren’t common yet, but there was no reason for them to believe the technology wouldn’t be improved.

No, you are. Literally read the goddamn title of the thread.