With a term like that, it’s not weird to link Wikipedia, but I actually would’ve understood it without it as well.

But here in Finland schools aren’t in loco parentis for the trip to and from school. Only while school’s in. That’s why for instance schools here couldn’t sanction pupils for fighting on the way home.

Who’s “them” and what is “the test”?

You needed a licence to drive a bicycle?

Oh. Easy.

Biphasic dose response.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0269749113004235

Also known as hormesis.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hormesis

Small/normal doses of cannabis can perk you up. Large ones sedate. Reasonable doses of alcohol give party energy. Larger ones make you go to bed.

Same with caffeine.

And everything, really.

That’s the point. They’re ridiculing the hypocrisy, not the sexism.

That is true also, yes

I hadn’t even noticed, lol.

It clearly says that yes. Although, if it’s just shit design from fonts and whanot, it might they now self-host a service and call it “Ladbible: Videos”, which then would mean it isn’t necessarily grammatically incorrect. For instance asking “do you think Youtube Shorts is a good service?”, people would answer “it’s shit” instead of “they’re shit”.

But the font really does make it look like “Videos is here” is completely it’s own thing and I hate it.

Every group has its idiots, but I will admit it felt like a higher class of idiot.

Oh that’s unlocked some memories. Wow what a flashback.

Oh fuck that’s true enough. Personally to me that is.

Well, I agree it is broad, yeah.

But, like… we’ll see if there’s gonna be any republicans trying to distance themselves from Trump. There were lots who endorsed Harris and who refused to endorse Trump, but not endorsing Trump just isn’t enough with this level of threat to democracy, imo.

“If you are neutral in situations of injustice, you have chosen the side of the oppressor. If an elephant has its foot on the tail of a mouse, and you say that you are neutral, the mouse will not appreciate your neutrality.” ― Desmond Tutu

This is why the left sucks as organising and actually voting for change in unison. A simple thing as outing assholes starts a 10h discussion, meanwhile on the right they are building cages…

“The problem with the world is that the intelligent people are full of doubts and the stupid ones are full of confidence.”

— Charles Bukowski

Oh I’m sorry, not cages, enclosures without exists, we don’t want to offend people identifying as cages!

This made me think of this 20s clip from Thor: Ragnarok.

Ah yes, but republican gay people. So only gay people who support things like Project 2025, which basically wants to eradicate the entire concept of homosexuality.

As far as I understood it at least

Not saying not to do what you say but Jewish population in America is only 2% this is not enough to make a change

Israel has a population of ~9.75 million.

The US has a population of ~335 million people.

As of 2020, the American Jewish population is estimated at 7.5 million people, accounting for 2.4% of the total US population.

If All American Jews managed to convince just 1.3 Israeli’s, that’d be the entire population influenced.

But perhaps you’re saying 2% isn’t enough to affect change internally within the US? Probably not true either, 2% is 1/50 people. And as we all know from tinfoil wearing conspiracy nuts, Jews have disproportionate representation in politics. (I do not know or care whether that statement has any veracity; I’m saying it sarcastically.)

We live in a global society, my friend.

Unfortunately they affect us all.

Well I’m not wrong in what I said about fallacies, but yeah, sure.

Enjoy your weekend.

I could but I don’t want to

"I totally have a girlfriend. No you wouldn’t know her, she’s Canadian. "

(See this is a strawman, much like the one you used earlier itt.)

Confidently idiotic people irk me.

Me2 man. Perhaps stop being one?

You’re the type who first of all sees these things as competitions, (“take the L, bro”), secondly, you think all you have to do to “win” a debate is to point out a fallacy.

You’re probably in the camp of people who think insults mean ad hominem? :D

You started this thread with a strawman you then claim isn’t a strawman, because of the intent you had while making it+

Oh now I realise what you’re doing. You genuinely think I’m as intellectually lazy and ingenuine as you, so you think I too am trying to bullshit my way through this?

I can refer back to any comment. Like the one which you try to assert that me pointing out your strawman… is a strawman?

Okay then. What’s the weak version of the argument I made to attack, and oh yeah, what argument is it that I’m trying to attack in the first place?

Oh you don’t have one, or have to come up with them, post hoc? It is somewhat amusing.

See, now you’re in “the spiral”. You can’t address the actual thing you said anymore, have expressed that you feel like you’re “wasting time”, but for some reason, you feel like you have to keep replying, despite having to resort to spamming memes.

It’s okay to just leave a thread, you know?

Perhaps if you didn’t treat conversations as competitions, you might actually learn what those fallacies you never read about actually mean.

Trump is Putin’s bumboy and will do anything he says.