There’s quite well defined legal framework of what Unions can and can’t do - this shouldn’t be a drama topic

has begun outsourcing quality assurance work without the union’s agreement

Were they obligated to ask union for permission?

No no, feel free to block me too. Most people here hate me for my opinions :)

You mean me or Elon?

Everything you don’t agree with is divisive, isn’t it? Every single comment that is even slightly pro Trump must be deleted and poster must be banned. The way you can live in happy bubble of the only right opinions…

Mike Pondsmith just extrapolated the trends he saw in the society - corporatism, drugs, plastic surgeries, stress, crime, prostitution. He just pushed these things to the extreme and put in scifi setting. This isn’t just Trump thing, this is happening for decades now.

It is. Elon licks Trumps butt because SpaceX space missions, and Trump licks Elons butt because of Twitter.

You assume those who didn’t vote, would vote for Harris. An unfounded assumption

When you have this much money, the life is just a game

Hyundai Design North America Vice President Ha Hak-soo said that people “get stressed, annoyed and steamed when they want to control something in a pinch but are unable to do so.”

How many years it took them to figure it out?

Exactly. I know someone who works in the food trade industry - this isn’t even that rare, small fuckups like this happen, except usually they get rectified long before local regulator intervenes

Self hosting is trivial these days. Any modern NVIDIA card and hundreds of models available online.

Demonic forces of physics.

What’s next? Banning Einsteins general relativity?

But flat out banning it without proper research would be irresponsible.

I think the whole argument is moot. AI image generation is available to pretty much everyone. It’s impossible to control what what people are doing with it

Child porn is a bad thing

Tell that to the priests

Every time I get either downvotes or a non answer like this.

they rely on more social cohesion to enforce social rules

How is this supposed to work in situation where individuals aren’t agreeing with each other? What about communication overhead when large amount of people is involved in decision making? These are the questions anarchists avoid answering.

The only thing I know to work in practice is Torrent protocol for data exchange - but it works in an environment where violence is completely infeasible, and it doesn’t even try to be fair or equal. It’s pure tit-for-tat (aka favor-for-favor) model when there’s bandwidth deficit, and pure charity when there’s a surplus

Also, data is perfectly quantifiable, which is not a thing in more complex enviroments

You just can’t apply torrent in the real life

Who in their right mind would turn down free weed?

A non-addict?

Anarchy means without hierarchy. That’s it. Rules can still be agreed upon.

Im not aware of any system (outside P2P file exchange protocols) that would make it possible.

But it’s the exact same thing. If there’s no hierarchy of some kind, then who’s going to enforce the law? Like putting criminals in jail and prevent violence on the streets?

Isn’t that a definition of anarchy? No law enforcement, everything goes, including uncool things?