• Cowbee [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    5 days ago

    I like the eReader -> pirated/free theory approach. You can use VPNs and whatnot to anonymize your downloads, store them locally, and the eReader is a nice middle-ground between physically reading and getting a ton of books you want to read.

    • ThanksObama5223 [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 days ago

      I have such a hard time reading anything but fiction on an e-reader, especially theory. i tend to underline and flip back to certain sections when reading theory and its so much easier to with a physical copy. this sucks because books, particularly theory, can be expensive

    • alexei_1917 [mirror/your pronouns, any]@hexbear.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 days ago

      Ooh, I like that too! I found an old e-reader in a box of junk I was cleaning up a couple months ago, first thing I did after finding out it does in fact still charge and turn on, was get some theory to read and load it on there, it hasn’t helped me actually get to reading it as much as I’d hoped it would, but it is an excellent solution if you want a device that does nothing but store and display text!

      • Cowbee [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        5 days ago

        I also like the “increase pages read by 1 per day” approach, up until it becomes too much to handle, be that 1 page or 50. It helps build the habit without overwhelming you!

        • alexei_1917 [mirror/your pronouns, any]@hexbear.netOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          5 days ago

          That sounds actually pretty useful.

          You should put together a post on this stuff, you seem not just well educated in theory but also good at teaching people the concepts and explaining how to read theory, I guess. Like a stereotypical inner party cadre of the good old days. A post full of methodology like this and little tips and tricks would probably be just as broadly useful as your reading list.

          • Cowbee [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            5 days ago

            Thanks, I appreciate it! Though I’m not an expert or anything, my list is just my own views and what I like, and that tip right there is just what works for me. I know it isn’t going to apply to everyone, and people will disagree with my theory list anyways. I just made it for my own selfish desires to have something I can share when I feel like it may be relevant!

            • alexei_1917 [mirror/your pronouns, any]@hexbear.netOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              5 days ago

              Yeah, I get that, it’s just that a lot of us are a lot worse at this than you seem to be, and I’ve noticed a tendency in leftist spaces to tell people to “read theory, darn it” or post reading lists, at a much higher rate than understanding that it’s not usually a lack of desire to read it leading folks to not do so and addressing real issues with solutions that have worked for at least some of us. So I’d encourage anyone who’s made a reading list to also share their tactics for getting themselves to sit down and read, and I’d encourage anyone who’s shared a trick or two to post all their tips and tricks somewhere. Not just you, comrade.

              • Cowbee [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                5 days ago

                Fair! That’s why the opening sections cover tips for study, and why it’s even a good idea in the first place. I just think that how to read is such a subjective area that really needs to be more fine-tuned than theory is, so it’s a lot more malleable. Thanks for the input!

                • alexei_1917 [mirror/your pronouns, any]@hexbear.netOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  5 days ago

                  Oh, it absolutely is. I actually watched an excellent video essay just this morning breaking down the American illiteracy crisis, and the complexity of what exactly educators and institutions need to be doing to teach kids how to read was a big point, as was the difference between just being able to recognize words on a page, and being able to understand the meaning and put multiple sentences together. I.e. what is “functional literacy” and why are there so many people who can technically read but often can’t navigate an instruction manual or a complicated form (or reading political theory).

                  “Reading is for commies! Of course people in [insert imperial core nation] can’t read!” is a good low hanging fruit joke to make, but there’s a lot of complicated reasons why reading theory is difficult for a lot of baby leftists, and why functional literacy is a dropping statistic in several countries.