• AbbysMuscles [she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    84
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Moids are fucking fixated on what women are doing. Does she have tattoos? Is she fucking? She’s fucking, right? Probably aborting the pregnancy too. And she’s not wearing a dress, but instead she’s wearing shorts like a WHORE.

    Everywhere it’s the same. Whether they have the legal power to back up their bullshit or not. Niqabs and anti-abortion laws and mass murder and FGM and MGTOW and denial of education and on and on and on. Masculinity can basically be defined by its terror of, and opposition to femininity at this point. How many of men’s problems are blamed on women across all generations, and why does every generation of moids fall for it every time? I’m so fucking sick of all of them.

    • SorosFootSoldier [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      77
      ·
      1 year ago

      They literally think women are cartoon characters that just go around getting knocked up and doing abortions for funsies, because if her hair isn’t natural or she has a tattoo she’s instantly a satanic harlot.

      • AbbysMuscles [she/her]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        52
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s a good way to put it. They literally don’t view women as human, as other humans with internal lives greater or equal to their own. They never have, at least since settled civilization got going. Not only are we subhuman to them, but we’re dangerous. Our thoughts and feelings and actions and self-expression is dangerous and must be rigidly controlled or, somehow, society collapses.

        • daisy [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          They literally don’t view women as human, as other humans with internal lives greater or equal to their own.

          Last sunday I did a Red-Dwarf-while-high rewatch marathon, and was pleasantly suprised by how well S2E6 aged. Lister calling Rimmer out for not understanding your exact point was nice to see again.

            • daisy [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              It’s a really fun ride! The humour can be a bit crude at times but it’s aged surprisingly well. I recommend just going in blind. This is the kind of show where continuity is just a suggestion to be cheerfully jettisoned if it gets in the way of a good joke.

              Some people say it doesn’t get good until season 3 with the permanent addition of a new cast member, but I think the first two seasons were also great in their own way. It’s funny throughout. There’s just a lot of changes throughout regarding character dynamics that keeps the humour fresh. It’s not the same people doing the same things for years on end.

              • WittyProfileName2 [she/her]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago
                spoilers

                What’s your take on seasons 6-8?

                I know a lot of fans hate the big setting changes that happen in the first episodes of series 6 and 8, and how largely they changed Kochanski’s character.

                • daisy [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I think main-cast changes are vital in a long-running comedy show. New character dynamics are new opportunities for jokes and plotlines. Otherwise you get The Simpsons: stale, stagnant, predictable.