I love playing with packet, and I love playing with APRS. So how do I decide?

There’s quite a bit of both packet and APRS activity in the area. I don’t want to put up another antenna at the moment because funds won’t allow, otherwise I’d get another cheap 2m rig for APRS.

On packet, I occasionally check in with other hams and send messages. I mostly keep it running because my webmap at packetradiomap.com uses my radio to map locally received stations. I could modify the webmap to not use my radio though.

I feel running an APRS station is more “useful” though, as my area isn’t covered very well by iGates or digipeaters.

So if you had to choose, would you go full time APRS or packet?

  • @K0STKEnglish
    1•1 year ago

    Do what ever “scratches your itch”. The choices of random internet users aren’t applicable to your situation.

    In our area both “modes” are effectively dead. There are two packet nodes and no meaningful traffic. And APRS is full of position reports from repeater objects and DV hotspots; we don’t use APRS for anything … no messaging, no event support, etc.

    It’s all quite sadly pointless. The luddites in our club are not interested in anything more than working DX and oversharing on repeater nets.